朱 涛. 2010: DEMETER卫星观测的LF/MF电场频谱特征初步研究. 地震学报, 32(4): 476-489.
引用本文: 朱 涛. 2010: DEMETER卫星观测的LF/MF电场频谱特征初步研究. 地震学报, 32(4): 476-489.
2010: A preliminary study on characteristics of average power spectrum density of LF/MF electric field observed by DEMETER satellite. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(4): 476-489.
Citation: 2010: A preliminary study on characteristics of average power spectrum density of LF/MF electric field observed by DEMETER satellite. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(4): 476-489.

DEMETER卫星观测的LF/MF电场频谱特征初步研究

A preliminary study on characteristics of average power spectrum density of LF/MF electric field observed by DEMETER satellite

  • 摘要: 利用法国DEMETER卫星观测的电场数据,研究了中国及邻区(0deg;——60deg;N,60deg;E——140deg;E),频段为10KHz——3MHz,时间段为2008年1月1日——2008年9月12日期间的平均功率谱密度特征.文中选择了犓狆指数的日平均值小于或等于4的数据,获得LF频段(10——20 MHz)和MF频段(20 KHz——3 MHz)以16天为周期的昼侧和夜侧的平均功率谱密度空间分布图,得到了以下初步结果.LF频段:① 昼侧,不同频率的谱在对应时段上形态相似度不高,主要呈现纬度分带特征.夜侧,不同频率的谱在对应时段上形态相似度较高,主要差异在于谱的幅度,同一频率不同时段的谱分带特征不明显;② 昼侧谱的幅度值跨度要比夜侧的小很多,前者一般为1——1.5个数量级,而后者一般在2个以上,甚至达到4个数量级;③ 在汶川地震前后,平均功率谱密度在成都——兰州一线存在明显的变化.MF 频段:① 昼侧,不同频率对应时段的谱形态没有明显的相似性,同一频率不同时段的谱形态可能具有较好、弱或不具有相似性,具有明显、弱或不具纬度分带特征.夜侧,某些频段对应时段的谱形态具有明显的相似性,同一频率不同时段或者分时期的不同时段的谱形态具有较好的相似性,不具有明显的纬度分带特征,具有弱分区或者弱经度分带特征;② 昼侧和夜侧的谱幅度变化都不大,基本都在0.5个数量级之内;③ 在汶川地震前后没有发现明显的平均功率谱密度变化.

     

    Abstract: Abstract:Characteristics of the average power spectrum density (APSD) are studied using the data of electric field observed by DEMETER satellite.The study area covers China and its adjacent regions(0deg;mdash;60deg;N, 60deg;Emdash;140deg;E), and the time period ranges from January 1, 2008, to September 12, 2008. The observed data during the days with average Kp index smaller than or equal to 4 were selected for analysis. Spatial distributions of dayside and nightside APSD with 16 day period were mapped for LF (10mdash;20 kHz) and MF (20 kHzmdash;3 MHz). We obtained the following preliminary results. For LF: ① Spatial distributions of dayside APSD in the same period and at different frequencies show poor similarity in pattern and are characterized by latitudinal zonation, while those of nightside APSD display good pattern similarity, with main difference only in amplitude and without clear zonation. ② The range of amplitude variation of dayside APSD is much smaller than that of nightside APSD, the former being generally in 1mdash;1.5 orders, while the latter varying beyond 2 orders and even up to 4 orders. ③ The APSD near Chengdu-Lanzhou changes clearly before and after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.For MF: ① Spatial distributions of dayside APSD in the same period and at different frequencies show no similarity, and the distributions in different periods and at the same frequency may have good, poor or no similarity and may show clear, poor or no zonation. While the distributions of nightside APSD in the same period and at some frequencies display very good pattern similarity. Good similarity can be seen in the nightside APSD patterns deduced from data in different periods and at the same frequency, but no latitudinal zonation or only weak longitudinal zonation can be found. ② Amplitude variations of both dayside and nightside APSD are not significant, being generally less than 0.5 orders. ③ The APSD near Chengdu-Lanzhou did not show clear changes before and after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.

     

/

返回文章
返回