Advanced Search
Zhang Y，Wang L W，Hu Z，Zhang X G，Lou X Y. 2024. Location method of point interference source and its practical application in geoelectric field observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica，46（1）：106−119. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220153
Citation: Zhang Y，Wang L W，Hu Z，Zhang X G，Lou X Y. 2024. Location method of point interference source and its practical application in geoelectric field observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica，46（1）：106−119. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220153
shu

Location method of point interference source and its practical application in geoelectric field observation

  • 1.

    Institute of Earthquake Forecasting，China Earthquake Administration，Beijing 100036，China

  • 2.

    National Institute of Natural Hazards，Ministry of Emergency Management of China，Beijing 100085，China

More Information
  • Received Date: August 21, 2022
  • Revised Date: November 13, 2022
  • Available Online: January 07, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • China’s seismic network currently comprises 113 geoelectric field monitoring stations. To effectively utilize geoelectric field monitoring data for earthquake prediction, it is crucial to accurately differentiate between seismic and non-seismic anomalies. However, with the rapid development of China’s economy, agricultural production, and industrial construction around these monitoring stations, interference from electrical equipment leakage has escalated. This interference represents a significant non-seismic anomaly that adversely affects the quality of observation data and its application efficiency.　　1） The impact of electrical equipment leakage on geoelectric field observation can be characterized as follows: 　　2） The observation curve exhibits significant steps, peaks, or dips.　　3） The daily variation pattern of the geoelectric field is suppressed.　　4） The amplitude of each component of the geoelectric field varies due to the relative positions of the leakage points.　　5） The interference in each channel begins and ends at the same time, synchronized with the leakage period, although the degree of influence may differ.　　6） The interference amplitude is inversely proportional to the distance between the interference source and the electrode and directly proportional to the magnitude of the leakage current.　　Leakage interference within the measurement area constitutes a non-seismic anomaly that significantly impacts the quality of the observation data. Therefore, it is essential to identify and promptly investigate sources of interference in daily earthquake monitoring to minimize data loss caused by such interference. Currently, two types of interference sources can be identified based on examples encountered by stations: point source interference and dipole source interference. However, there is currently no high-precision positioning algorithm available for point sources.　　This study established a point source interference model based on a uniform semi-infinite space, analyzed the theoretical influence amplitude of point sources on geoelectric field observation through model theory, proposed a point source interference localization method, and applied the algorithm to the actual interference investigation work of Gaoyou Station in Jiangsu Province and Hanwang Station in Gansu Province.　　The position of the interference source was calculated based on the observed interference shape and change amplitude. The positioning direction and area were consistent with the actual interference source position. The positioning error of interference sources outside the measurement area was less than 2%, and the positioning error of interference sources inside the measurement area was less than 20 meters. 　　The main sources of positioning calculation errors are as follows: First, this method establishes a point source model based on a uniform semi-infinite medium, but the underground medium of the station is not completely uniform and isotropic. The non-uniform structure of the underground electrical properties will affect the propagation of electric field signals, resulting in certain calculation errors. However, this error has a relatively small effect, and the source of interference can still be located in a small area. Second, when the observation data is interfered with, the interference signal and the ground electric field observation signal are superimposed, and the ground electric field is constantly changing, making it difficult to accurately extract the interference amplitude. Inaccurate extraction of the interference amplitude leads to errors in the calculation results. In subsequent applications, multiple positioning calculations can be used to calculate the average and minimize the error in the calculation results. The positioning algorithm proposed in this article provides a sound solution for identifying point source leakage interference.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (62)
  • 安张辉,杜学彬,谭大诚,范莹莹,刘君,崔腾发. 2013. 四川芦山MS7.0和汶川MS8.0地震前地电场变化研究[J]. 地球物理学报,56(11):3868–3876. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131128
    An Z H,Du X B,Tan D C,Fan Y Y,Liu J,Cui T F. 2013. Study on the geo-electric field variation of Sichuan Lushan MS7.0 and Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,56(11):3868–3876 (in Chinese).
    安张辉,杜学彬,范莹莹,刘君,谭大诚,崔腾发,陈军营,王建军. 2015. 2013年芦山MS7.0地震前地电场变化特征研究[J]. 地震,35(1):91–99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2015.01.010
    An Z H,Du X B,Fan Y Y,Liu J,Tan D C,Cui T F,Chen J Y,Wang J J. 2015. Characteristics of geo-electric field changes before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake,35(1):91–99 (in Chinese).
    陈志刚,田山,徐学恭,马朝晖,陈嵩. 2012. 地电场观测漏电干扰的排查一例[J]. 华北地震科学,30(4):44–48.
    Chen Z G,Tian S,Xu X G,Ma Z H,Chen S. 2012. Study on electricity-leaking interference in geoelectric field observation at Xuzhuangzi seismic station[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,30(4):44–48 (in Chinese).
    范莹莹, 安张辉, 陈军营, 刘君, 王建军, 崔腾发, 王丽. 2013. 岷县漳县MS6.6地震前平凉台地电场变化[J].地震工程学报, 35(4): 827−834.
    Fan Y Y, An Z H, Chen J Y, Liu J, Wang J J, Cui T F, Wang L. 2013. The variation of geoelectrical field at Pingliang station, Gansu Province, before the Minxian-Zhangxian MS6.6 earthquake. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 35（4）: 827−834（in Chinese）.
    范莹莹,杜学彬,谭大诚,安张辉,刘君,王建军. 2015. 芦山MS7.0与岷县漳县MS6.6地震前甘肃地区部分台站地电场变化[J]. 地震,35(1):100–111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2015.01.011
    Fan Y Y,Du X B,Tan D C,An Z H,Liu J,Wang J J. 2015. Geo-electrical field variations in Gansu area before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 and Minxian-Zhangxian MS6.6 earthquakes[J]. Earthquake,35(1):100–111 (in Chinese).
    高曙德,汤吉,杜学彬,刘小凤,苏永刚,陈彦平,狄国荣,梅东林,詹艳,王立凤. 2010. 汶川8.0级地震前后电磁场的变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报,53(3):512–525.
    Gao S D,Tang J,Du X B,Liu X F,Su Y G,Chen Y P,Di G R,Mei D L,Zhan Y,Wang L F. 2010. The change characteristics of electromagnetic field before to after Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,53(3):512–525 (in Chinese).
    龚永俭,张长轩,程立康,王建国,刘学领,徐学恭,康健. 2020. 地电场环境干扰跟踪分析关键问题研究[J]. 高原地震,32(1):26–38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2020.01.005
    Gong Y J,Zhang C X,Cheng L K,Wang J G,Liu X L,Xu X G,Kang J. 2020. Study on key problems of tracking analysis of the geoelectric field environmental interference[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,32(1):26–38 (in Chinese).
    黄清华. 2005. 地震电磁观测研究简述[J]. 国际地震动态,(11):2–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4975.2005.11.002
    Huang Q H. 2005. The state-of-the-art in seismic electromagnetic observation[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,(11):2–5 (in Chinese).
    蒋延林. 2008. 高邮地震台地电阻率和地电场勘选及建设[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,29(6):57–64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2008.06.011
    Jiang Y L. 2008. The survey and construction of the earth resistivity and the geoelectric field in Gaoyou seismic station[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,29(6):57–64 (in Chinese).
    蒋延林,赵卫红,王福才,张骞,朱晔. 2015. 一种地电场观测环境干扰的分析和试验研究[J]. 中国地震,31(1):158–164.
    Jiang Y L,Zhao W H,Wang F C,Zhang Q,Zhu Y. 2015. Analysis and experimental study of the environment interference in the geo-electric field observation[J]. Earthquake Research in China,31(1):158–164 (in Chinese).
    李金铭. 2005. 地电场与勘探电法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 62−63.
    Li J M. 2005. Geoelectric Field and Electrical Exploration[M]. Beijing: Geology Press: 62−63 （in Chinese）.
    林向东,徐平,鲁跃,张洪魁,武安绪,李菊珍. 2007. 地电场观测中几种常见干扰[J]. 华北地震科学,25(1):16–22.
    Lin X D,Xu P,Lu Y,Zhang H K,Wu A X,Li J Z. 2007. Several typical interferences in geoelectric observation[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,25(1):16–22 (in Chinese).
    马君钊,张磊,关华平,田山,马骥. 2010. 大地电场观测各类干扰源的调研与分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,31(5):65–72.
    Ma J Z,Zhang L,Guan H P,Tian S,Ma J. 2010. Analysis and research into each interference source of geoelectric field[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,31(5):65–72 (in Chinese).
    马钦忠. 2008. 地电场多极距观测装置系统与文安MS5.1地震前首都圈地电场异常研究[J]. 地震学报,30(6):615–625. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2008.06.007
    Ma Q Z. 2008. Multi-dipole observation system and study on the abnormal variation of the geoelectric field observed at Capital Network before the 2006 Wen’an,Hebei of China,MS5.1 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,30(6):615–625 (in Chinese).
    马钦忠,钱家栋. 2003. 地下电性非均匀结构对地电场信号的影响[J]. 地震,23(1):1–7.
    Ma Q Z,Qian J D. 2003. The influence of inhomogeneous geoelectric structure on the signals of geoelectric field[J]. Earthquake,23(1):1–7 (in Chinese).
    马钦忠,钱家栋,李伟,赵文舟,方国庆. 2016. 源自多个大电流源的华东地区地电场空间变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报,59(7):2598–2614.
    Ma Q Z,Qian J D,Li W,Zhao W Z,Fang G Q. 2016. Characteristics of the spatial variation of geoelectric field signals recorded at the stations in Huadong area in China when 4 heavy currents are injected[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,59(7):2598–2614 (in Chinese).
    马钦忠,李伟,赵文舟,周江南,龚耀. 2017. 人工源地电场空间变化区域性特征[J]. 地震学报,39(4):455–468. doi: 10.11939/jass.2017.04.002
    Ma Q Z,Li W,Zhao W Z,Zhou J N,Gong Y. 2017. Regional characteristics of artificial source geoelectric field spatial variations[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,39(4):455–468 (in Chinese).
    毛桐恩,席继楼,王燕琼,尹淑芝. 1999. 地震过程中的大地电场变化特征[J]. 地球物理学报,42(4):520–528.
    Mao T E,Xi J L,Wang Y Q,Yin S Z. 1999. The variation characteristics of the telluric field in the process of earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,42(4):520–528 (in Chinese).
    梅东林. 2019. 陇南汉王地电场观测干扰因素分析[J]. 高原地震,31(2):42–47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-586X.2019.02.008
    Mei D L. 2019. Analysis on interference factors in observation of ground electric field in Hanwang in the south of Gansu Province[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,31(2):42–47 (in Chinese).
    钱复业,赵玉林. 2005. 地电场短临预报方法研究[J]. 地震,25(2):33–40.
    Qian F Y,Zhao Y L. 2005. Study on geoelectric field method for short-term and impending earthquake prediction[J]. Earthquake,25(2):33–40 (in Chinese).
    全国地震标准化技术委员会. 2009. DB/T 34-2009 地震地电观测方法地电场观测[S]. 北京: 地震出版社: 6.
    National Technical Committee for Seismic Standardization. 2009. DB/T 34-2009 The Method of Earthquake-Related Geoclectrical Monitoring: Geoelectric Field Observation[S]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 6 （in Chinese）.
    谭大诚,赵家骝,席继楼,刘大鹏,安张辉. 2012. 青藏高原中强地震前的地电场变异及构成解析[J]. 地球物理学报,55(3):875–885.
    Tan D C,Zhao J L,Xi J L,Liu D P,An Z H. 2012. The variation of waveform and analysis of composition for the geoelectrical field before moderate or strong earthquakes in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,55(3):875–885 (in Chinese).
    田山,张磊,王建国,徐学恭,董洪军,姚会琴. 2012. 汶川、玉树大地震前的地电场异常[J]. 地球物理学进展,27(3):878–887.
    Tian S,Zhang L,Wang J G,Xu X G,Dong H J,Yao H Q. 2012. Geoelectric field anomaly before Wenchuan and Yushu earthquake[J]. Progress in Geophysics,27(3):878–887 (in Chinese).
    王福才,蒋延林,张骞,赵卫红,朱晔,薛家富. 2013. 地电观测场地干扰的一种测试查找方法[J]. 西北地震学报,35(增刊):126–134.
    Wang F C,Jiang Y L,Zhang Q,Zhao W H,Zhu Y,Xue J F. 2013. A test and search method for the interferences in geoelectric observation field[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,35(S1):126–134 (in Chinese).
    卫清,颜蕊,韩秀红,温晋. 2017. 基于牛顿迭代法的地电场观测人为漏电干扰源反演及其应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,32(4):1490–1495.
    Wei Q,Yan R,Han X H,Wen J. 2017. Inversion for artificial electricity-leaking in geo-electric field observations based on Newton iteration and its application[J]. Progress in Geophysics,32(4):1490–1495 (in Chinese).
    席继楼,关华平,刘超,庄楠,杨晓明,张治国,次卓嘎,格桑卓玛,马爱明. 2016. 2015年尼泊尔8.1级地震前后拉萨地电场观测数据变化分析[J]. 地震,36(2):1–13.
    Xi J L,Guan H P,Liu C,Zhuang N,Yang X M,Zhang Z G,Ci Z G,K D,Ma A M. 2016. Geo-electric field changes observed at Lhasa geomagnetic station before and after the 2015 Nepal M8.1 earthquake[J]. Earthquake,36(2):1–13 (in Chinese).
    席继楼,关华平,刘超,庄楠,武建华,颜晓晔. 2018. 几次大地震前后地电场中长期变化分析与研究[J]. 地震,38(2):117–126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3274.2018.02.011
    Xi J L,Guan H P,Liu C,Zhuang N,Wu J H,Yan X Y. 2018. Immediate to long-term changes of geoelectric potential difference before and after several large earthquakes[J]. Earthquake,38(2):117–126 (in Chinese).
    应允翔,薛志明,汪继林. 2018. 蒙城地震台地电场观测干扰排查[J]. 科技资讯,16(2):42–43.
    Ying Y X, Xue Z M, Wang J L. 2018. Investigation on the interference of electric field observation in Mengcheng seismic station[J]. Science &Technology Information,16(2):42–43 (in Chinese).
    张宇,王兰炜,赵家骝,蒋延林,胡哲,张兴国,王福才. 2017. 地电观测中电磁干扰源定位方法研究[J]. 地震学报,39(3):367–373.
    Zhang Y,Wang L W,Zhao J L,Jiang Y L,Hu Z,Zhang X G,Wang F C. 2017. Location method of electromagnetic interference sources in geo-electric field observation[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,39(3):367–373 (in Chinese).
    赵玉红,冯丽丽,李霞,张文涛. 2019. 漏电干扰对地电场观测中数据变化的特征分析[J]. 高原地震,31(增刊):72–76.
    Zhao Y H,Feng L L,Li X,Zhang W T. 2019. Analysis on characteristics of data variation in earth electric field observation by leakage interference[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research,31(S1):72–76 (in Chinese).
    Varotsos P,Alexopoulous K,Nomicos K. 1981. Seismic electric currents[J]. Prakt Akad Athenon,56:277–286.
    Varotsos P,Alexopoulos K. 1984. Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes,Ⅰ[J]. Tectonophysics,110(1/2):73–98.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Yang Qiyan, Wu Qingju, Wei Yajie, Cao Jingjie, Cai Zhicheng, Yang Zhiquan, Sheng Yanrui. 2024: Teleseismic P-wave data reconstruction based on compressive sensing theory. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 46(3): 413-424. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220197
    Yao Xiuyi, Teng Yuntian, Yang Dongmei, Yao Yuan, Chen Jun. 2016: On reconstruction technique of geomagnetic observation data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(6): 878-888. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.06.007
    Li Caihua, Teng Yuntian, Zhang Yang, Hu Xingxing. 2014: Applications of FFT and DFT in amplitude-frequency characteristic test of seismic data recorders. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(5): 956-963. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.05.018
    Zheng Xian, Zhao Cuiping, Zhou Lianqing, Zheng Sihua. 2013: Reliability analysis of retrieving surface waves from ambient noise data between seismic station pairs: An example of application at broadband stations in central and eastern China. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(2): 218-228. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.02.008
    Li Wei, Ma Qinzhong, Song Zhiping, Wang Guanyue. 2013: Application of wavelet transform to the analysis of geoelectric field data. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(1): 26-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.004
    Li Lingliup,　Wang Qingdongup　Shen Wenyuanup 　Zhu Liangbaoup3, loans.com sh lucashadv. 2012: Application of S transform in surface wave denoising. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 34(6): 830-840.
    2010: 震源参数对强地面震动模拟结果的影响
    . Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(1): 51-59.
    2009: 用小波方法系统检验强震“前驱波”. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 31(1): 1-12.
    GUO HONGSHENG, CHEN JUNLIANG. 1989: REAL-TIME SEISMIC WAVE DATA COMPRESSION METHODS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(1): 68-80.
    • Supplements (1)

  • Article Video

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(36)

    1. 董敏，陈其峰，郑家军，刘海林，张军，杨立涛，韩博，熊玮，马娟，池国民，吴婧. 张店—仁河断裂带多项土壤气背景值初步分析. 高原地震. 2025(01): 6-14 .
    2. 祖丽皮牙·艾尼瓦尔，闫玮，张伟，李新勇，麻荣. 柯坪断裂带土壤气地球化学变化特征及其与强震的关系. 高原地震. 2025(01): 15-23 .
    3. 张菂，李源，张伟，赵伟乔，秦忠培，郭少峰. 2023年8月西代村跨断层短水准异常分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2024(06): 83-91 .
    4. 李静，周贺，陈志，陆丽娜，杜建国. 北京西部活动断裂CO_2与Rn脱气特征及其环境影响. 地震研究. 2023(01): 49-57 .
    5. 陈宇轩. 北京延庆五里营地下流体资料时频特征与地震活动关系. 华北地震科学. 2023(02): 58-68+97 .
    6. 王喜龙，罗银花，金秀英，杨梦尧，孔祥瑞. 辽南地区断裂带的断层土壤气地球化学特征及其对区域应力调整的指示. 地震地质. 2023(03): 710-734 .
    7. 张文亮，李营，刘兆飞，胡乐，路畅，陈志，韩晓昆. 六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系. 地震地质. 2023(03): 753-771 .
    8. 李继业，胡澜缤，李营，马龙辰，王强，张思萌，李冬妮. 松原M_S5.1地震前断层土壤气H_2、Hg地球化学特征与热红外异常响应研究. 地震工程学报. 2023(04): 933-945 .
    9. 刘兆飞，何鸿毅，陈志，李营，路畅，邵俊杰，高梓涵. 北京黄庄—高丽营断裂土壤气体地球化学特征及其对地震活动的指示. 地震学报. 2023(04): 727-746 . 本站查看
    10. 符泽宇，刘燕翔，李金，王妍. 唐山断裂带土壤断层气CO_2浓度的映震效能. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2023(04): 85-94 .
    11. 鲍志诚，赵爱平，吕坚，肖健，周红艳，宁洪涛，汤兰荣，陈浩. 瑞昌—武宁活动断裂带土壤气地球化学特征. 地震研究. 2022(02): 249-256 .
    12. 路畅，李营，胡乐，赵策，刘兆飞，邵俊杰，陈志. 唐山地区土壤气Rn通量及其与地震活动的关系. 地震研究. 2022(02): 241-248 .
    13. 王喜龙，杨梦尧，郭红霞，刘建光. 辽宁盘一井氢气浓度异常特征及预报效能分析. 地震研究. 2022(02): 275-283 .
    14. 王江，陈志，张帆，张志相，刘兆飞，何鸿毅，唐杰，丁志华，张素欣. 基于土壤气体地球化学的雄安新区活动断裂空间展布及活动性探讨. 地震研究. 2022(02): 264-274 .
    15. 闫玮，朱成英，李新勇，许秋龙，汪成国，徐衍刚. 新疆伽师M_S6.4地震前后柯坪断裂土壤气地球化学特征变化. 内陆地震. 2022(04): 362-368 .
    16. 王喜龙，杨梦尧，孔祥瑞，杨振鹏. 辽宁朝阳-北票断裂跨断层水准与断层土壤气地球化学特征对比分析. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2021(06): 600-605 .
    17. 阚宝祥，沈钰，戴陈兵，曾利萍，张震峰，张帆，于俊谊. 浙江省珊溪水库地区土壤Rn和H_2地球化学特征. 地震工程学报. 2021(06): 1310-1316 .
    18. 王喜龙，贾晓东，杨梦尧. 辽宁金州断裂断层土壤气地球化学调查. 中国地震. 2021(04): 767-779 .
    19. 刘峰立，欧阳澍培，李营，周晓成，颜玉聪. 铜陵市土壤气环境地球化学特征. 环境科学与技术. 2021(S2): 81-88 .
    20. 肖攀，汪世仙，李露露，潘洁，张伟峰. 蚌埠地震台土壤气Rn和C0_2地球化学特征分析. 科技资讯. 2020(07): 195-200 .
    21. 娄露玲，胡宁，王宇，张宝山，马志敏，王明亮. 汤阴地堑南部土壤CO_2空间分布特征. 华北地震科学. 2020(04): 34-41 .
    22. 康健，赵谊，臧姗姗，徐岳仁，王丽梅，刘长生. 依兰-伊通断裂方正-萝北段氢气特征研究. 震灾防御技术. 2020(02): 443-451 .
    23. 康健，徐岳仁，姜云爽，杜天然，马艳丽，李继业. 依兰—伊通断裂北段断层氢气的地球化学特征分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2020(04): 111-120 .
    24. 苏鹤军，王宗礼，曹玲玲，张慧，李晨桦，周慧玲. 断裂带土壤气测量方法在断层活动性研究中的应用——以嘉峪关断层为例. 中国地质. 2020(06): 1894-1903 .
    25. 苏荣托雅，高小其. 我国地震断层土壤气流动观测调查. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2020(05): 122-127 .
    26. 缪阿丽，张扬，方震，李锋，王维，高力. 郯庐断裂带新沂——泗洪段土壤气Rn体积活度和CO_2浓度特征研究. 地震. 2019(01): 48-57 .
    27. 张磊，刘耀炜，包创，郭丽爽. 安宁河断裂带土壤汞的分布特征. 地震学报. 2019(02): 249-258+278 . 本站查看
    28. 张磊，刘耀炜，包创，高小其，苏琴，方震. 川西冕宁断层土壤气特征. 环境化学. 2019(04): 777-783 .
    29. 李晨桦，张慧，苏鹤军，周慧玲，徐钦. CO_2气体在地震孕育与发生过程中的作用及其机理研究. 地震工程学报. 2019(03): 750-756 .
    30. 杨江，李营，陈志，孙凤霞，赵建明，李静，王江. 唐山断裂带南西段和北东段土壤气Rn和CO_2浓度特征. 地震. 2019(03): 61-70 .
    31. 刘兆飞，李营，陈志，崔月菊，路畅，杨江，赵元鑫. 吉兰泰断陷盆地周缘断裂带气体释放及其对断层活动性的指示意义. 地震学报. 2019(05): 613-632+680 . 本站查看
    32. 李源，马兴全，夏修军，谢恒义，王志铄，赵显刚. 河南新郑—太康断裂东段土壤气体地球化学特征. 地震. 2018(03): 49-57 .
    33. 李静，周晓成，石宏宇，孙凤霞，陆丽娜，陈超，曾令华，陈志. 首都圈西北部主要活动断裂CO_2、Rn、Hg脱气对环境的影响. 环境化学. 2018(05): 931-941 .
    34. 李静，陈志，陆丽娜，周晓成，李营. 夏垫活动断裂CO_2、Rn、Hg脱气对环境的影响. 矿物岩石地球化学通报. 2018(04): 629-638+795 .
    35. 赵建明，李营，陈志，刘兆飞，赵荣琦，荣伟健. 蔚县-广灵断裂和口泉断裂气体排放和断裂活动性关系. 地震地质. 2018(06): 1402-1416 .
    36. 张磊，高小其，包创，李静，李旭茂. 呼图壁地下储气库构造气体地球化学特征. 地震地质. 2018(05): 1059-1071 .

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (146) PDF downloads (49) Cited by(47)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    Supplements

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return