不同类型光缆对地表和井中分布式声波传感信号质量的影响研究

The influence of optical fibers on the data acquisition quality of distributed acoustic sensing: Surface and borehole case studies

  • 摘要: 近年来,分布式声波传感技术(DAS)以其低成本、高密度、可实时观测等优势在地震学等多个学科领域迅速发展并得到了广泛应用。光纤作为DAS观测系统中重要的传感元件,其本身结构可直接影响数据采集质量,进而影响数据分析结果;同时光纤的物理特性还会影响野外观测成本和观测难度。然而,如何在地球物理观测中选择合适的光纤依然缺乏定量参考。为此,本文根据地震数据的关键特征定义了一套评价指标,用来定量评估DAS观测数据的质量;然后,针对地表浅埋布设DAS设备和垂直井中布设DAS设备两种主要的地震观测系统,设计了对比试验方案,并分别选取不同型号的光缆进行主、被动源数据采集。最后,对不同型号光缆观测信号的各项指标进行评价和排名,从而筛选出综合表现最优的光缆。结果表明,相同观测条件下不同型号光缆采集的振动信号数据质量存在较为明显的差异,尤其是在井中采集的DAS数据。因此,选取合适的光缆进行观测有助于采集高质量的DAS数据,为后续监测地下微小震动信号及可靠的地下结构成像奠定基础。

     

    Abstract:
    In recent years, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has experienced rapid development and extensive applications in seismology and various other fields, owing to its advantages of low cost, high spatial resolution, and real-time monitoring capabilities.As a critical sensing component in DAS observational systems, optical fibers can directly affect the quality of acquired data and, consequently, the results. Meanwhile, the physical properties of optical fibers are also closely related to the cost and difficulty of field deployment. However, a quantitative guideline for selecting suitable optical fibers for geophysical surveys is still lacking. In this study, to fill this gap, we first propose a comprehensive set of criteria based on the key attributes of seismic data to evaluate the quality of DAS records quantitatively, including relative sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio, fidelity compared to data recorded by nodal stations, and semblance across multiple channels. Then, we conduct rigorous evaluations of DAS data recorded by two diverse seismic observational systems: A DAS cable deployed in a surface trench and a DAS cable deployed in a vertical borehole.
    In the former experiment, a trench approximately 20−30 cm deep and 90 m long was excavated on a lawn adjacent to two main urban roads. Five regular optical communication cables were deployed in this trench to ensure identical coupling conditions. The five optical cables were then fused end-to-end into a single continuous cable, which was connected to a DAS interrogator for data collection. Along the trench, 21 short-period nodal seismometers were deployed at 4-m intervals to assess the fidelity of the DAS records. Active signals from hammering were generated, and spatiotemporal 2D cross-correlation template matching was used to accurately determine the location of the DAS channels. Then, the signals recorded by different optical cables were compared trace-by-trace. The analyzed data include active signals from hammering, surface waves generated by traffic, and cross-correlation functions of ambient noise. For the active-source signals, we calculated the relative sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio in both time and frequency domains, and data fidelity. Since DAS records strains or strain rates rather than particle velocities (as seismometers do), unit conversion is required before calculating fidelity. For the traffic-generated surface waves, fidelity and semblance were computed. The fidelity of the surface waves was notably higher than that of the signals generated by hammering. For the cross-correlation functions from seismic ambient noise, only the signal-to-noise ratio was compared. Systematic evaluations with various sources revealed distinct differences between the evaluated cables, with the overall performance of the optical cables in vibration reception ranked as follows: YZ, GYFTY, GYTA, ADSS, and GJFJV.
    The best-performing YZ cable retained for the borehole experiment, in which three additional armored optical cables (YPTPU, SCJKBH, and SCTX3Y) were also selected. These four cables were installed in a 200-meter-deep borehole. Below 80 m depth, expansive clay pellets were used as infill, while silica sand was used above this depth. Given the limited space in the borehole, which made fusing challenging, each cable was connected to an equivalent interrogator for data acquisition. Several active sources were used near the well to generate signals. Due to significant differences in coupling between the shallow and deep sections of the borehole, only data recorded by channels shallower than 80 m were considered for evaluation. The relative sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio, and semblance of data from the four cables were evaluatedand considerable differences are observed. Overall, the YPTPU cable is found to have the best performance for DAS data collection in the borehole.
    The results of this study indicate that distinct variations in data quality can be found among different optical cables, particularly within the borehole applications. Therefore, proper selection of cables is essential for collecting high-quality DAS data, which is crucial for monitoring weak signals and achieving reliable subsurface imaging.

     

/

返回文章
返回