芦山MS7.0强震前单台波速比变化特征研究

王林瑛, 李艳娥, 郑需要, 王生文

王林瑛, 李艳娥, 郑需要, 王生文. 2014: 芦山MS7.0强震前单台波速比变化特征研究. 地震学报, 36(1): 42-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.01.004.
引用本文: 王林瑛, 李艳娥, 郑需要, 王生文. 2014: 芦山MS7.0强震前单台波速比变化特征研究. 地震学报, 36(1): 42-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.01.004.
Wang Linying, Li Yan’e, Zheng Xuyao, Wang Shengwen. 2014: Temporal variation of vP/vS at single seismic station before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(1): 42-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.01.004.
Citation: Wang Linying, Li Yan’e, Zheng Xuyao, Wang Shengwen. 2014: Temporal variation of vP/vS at single seismic station before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 36(1): 42-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.01.004.

芦山MS7.0强震前单台波速比变化特征研究

基金项目: 中国地震局地球物理研究所基本科研业务专项(DQJB11C09)和地震局老专家科研基金“地震波速比时空演化场的分析研究”联合资助.
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    王林瑛, E-mail: wang_linying@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P315.72

Temporal variation of vP/vS at single seismic station before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake

  • 摘要: 在搜集和整理中国地震局四川数字地震台网2001年1月—2013年7月震相观测报告的基础上, 采用单台多震和达测定法, 重点分析研究了芦山地震前波速比时空变化特征. 为保证计算结果的可靠性和稳定性, 对所收集到的单台震相数据和计算结果的精度进行系统的筛选和限定, 同时对出现异常的地震台, 进行不同台站方位和距台站不同空间范围的波速比时空变化特征的分区细化对比研究. 根据其存在的共性和差异, 探讨预测孕震体空间尺度的可能性. 结果发现, 龙门山断裂带南段及附近地区的小金、 蒙顶山、 油罐顶、 花马寺和五马坪等5个台站的波速比在芦山地震前均存在较明显的降低过程; 小金、 蒙顶山、 油灌顶和花马寺等4个台站的波速比异常降低过程大约持续了3年半, 震前除小金台未见明显回返过程外, 其它3个台站均在震前1年左右出现回返特征; 峨眉山台和五马坪台的波速比时间演化特征差异性较大, 表现出一定的复杂性. 从芦山地震前波速比时间变化特征的动态跟踪中还发现, 强震前波速比异常区的范围具有向未来震中及其附近地区收缩的趋势.
    Abstract: Based on the seismic phase data recorded by Sichuan Digital Seismic Network from January of 2001 to July of 2013, this study analyzes the spatio-temporal variation of wave velocity ratio vP/vS before the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake by using Wadati method of single station and multi-earthquake. To ensure the accuracy and stability of the calculated results, we carefully winnow the data. Moreover, we compare the wave velocity ratios calculated by using phase data recorded by the stations with different azimuths and different epicentral distances, so that we discuss the size of potential seismogenic body for future earthquakes. Our results show that, in the southern Longmenshan fault and its surrounding area, there was an obvious decrease in wave velocity ratio at five stations (XJI, MDS, YGD, HMS and WMP) before the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake. In particular, for the four stations (XJI, MDS, YGD and HMS), there had been an obvious vP/vS decrease for 3.5 years before the Lushan earthquake; except the station XJI, at other three stations appeared a recovery of vP/vS ratio one year before the earthquake. The anomalous characteristics are largely different for the stations EMS and WMP, indicating some complexity. Tracing the temporal variations of vP/vS, it is also found that the extent of the region with anomalous wave velocity ratio tends to concentrate at the future epicenter and its surrounding regions.
  • 图  1   蒙顶山台离散点排除前(a)后(b)满足计算约束条件的震相数据总体和达曲线图

    Figure  1.   Wadati curves of phase data satisfying the constraint conditions before (a) and after (b) eliminating the discrete points for thestation MDS

    图  2   小金台离散点排除前(a)后(b)满足计算约束条件的震相数据总体和达曲线图

    Figure  2.   Wadati curves of phase data satisfying the constraint conditions before (a) and after (b) eliminating the discrete points for thestation XJI

    图  3   四川及邻区2001年1月—2013年3月地震震中空间分布图

    Figure  3.   Epicentral distribution of Sichuan Province and its adjacent regions from January 2001 to March 2013

    图  4   芦山地震前波速比异常台站和正常台站的空间分布

    Figure  4.   Distribution of stations with wave velocity ratio decreasing (denoted by red triangles) and those with normal ratio (denoted by blue triangles) before the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake

    图  5   蒙顶山台(a)、 小金台(b)、 油罐顶台(c)和花马寺台(d) 2001年1月—2013年6月波速比时间变化曲线

    蓝色曲线为实际波速比值, 红色曲线为10个点滑动平均值, 黑色实线为波速比 平均值, 黑色虚线为1倍方差值, 灰色竖线为每组数据的计算误差

    Figure  5.   vP/vS versus time curves for the stations MDS (a), XJI (b), YGD (c) and HMS (d) from January 2001 to June 2013

    The blue curve denotesvP/vS values, the red curve denotes moving average ratio over 10 points, thesolid black line denotes the average vP/vS ratio, dashed black lines denote the standard deviation, and the grey vertical bars denote deviation

    图  6   五马坪台(a)和峨眉山台(b) 2001年1月—2013年6月波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  6.   vP/vS versus time curves for the stations WMP (a) and EMS (b) from January 2001 to June 2013

    图  7   雷波台(a)、 姑咱台(b)、 成都台(c)、 道孚台(d)、 汶川台(e)和马尔康台(f) 2001年1月—2013年6月波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  7.   vP/vS versus time curves for the stations LBO (a), GZA (b), CD2 (c), DFU (d), WCH (e) and MEK (f) from January 2001 to June 2013

    图  8   小金台(XJI)选定地震的空间分布图(a)及东区(b)和西区(c)的波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  8.   The selected epicentral distribution for XJI station (a), vP/vS versus time curves for the east area (b) and west area (c) of the XJI station

    图  9   油罐顶台(YGD)选定地震的空间分布图(a)及东区(b)和西区(c)的波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  9.   The selected epicentral distribution for the YGD station (a), vP/vS versus time curves for the east area (b) and west area (c) of the YGD station

    图  10   蒙顶山台(MDS)选定地震的空间分布图(a)及中东区(b)和西区(c)波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  10.   The selected epicentral distribution for MDS station (a), vP/vS versus time curves for the middle-east area (b) and west area (c) of the MDS station

    图  11   油榨坪台(YZP)选定地震的空间分布图(a)和西南区波速比时间变化曲线(b)

    Figure  11.   The selected epicentral distribution for YZP station (a) as well as vP/vS versus time curve for the southwest area of YZP station (b)

    图  12   成都台(CD2)选定地震的空间分布图(a)和西南区波速比时间变化曲线(b)

    Figure  12.   (a) The selected epicentral distribution for CD2 station; (b) vP/vS versus time curve for the southwest area of CD2 station

    图  13   蒙顶山台(MDS)选定地震的空间分布图(a)及分别以134.4 km (b), 168.0 km (c), 201.6 km (d) 和 235.2 km (e)为半径的圆域内的波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  13.   The selected epicentral distribution for the station MDS (a), vP/vS versus time curves for theMDS station at the radia 134.4 km (b), 168.0 km (c), 201.6 km (d) and 235.2 km (e)

    图  14   小金台(XJI)选定地震的空间分布图(a)及分别以134.4 km (b), 168.0 km (c), 201.6 km (d) 和 235.2 km (e)为半径的圆域内的波速比时间变化曲线

    Figure  14.   The selected epicenter distribution for XJI station (a), vP/vS versus time curves for XJI station at the radia 134.4 km (b), 168.0 km (c), 201.6 km (d) and 235.2 km (e)

    表  1   龙门山断裂西侧台站波速比平均值对比表

    Table  1   Average velocity ratios for the stations in the west of Longmenshan fault zone

    台站震级下限波速比 总平均值方差样本 组数汶川地震前波 速比总平均值汶川地震后波 速比总平均值汶川地震前后 波速比变化量
    黑水ML≥2.51.6860.01626101.6641.6890.025
    青川ML≥2.51.6920.01129671.6721.6930.021
    汶川ML≥2.51.6830.01936841.6711.6840.013
    平武ML≥2.51.7070.01343751.6851.7080.023
    松潘ML≥2.51.6850.01529701.6681.6860.018
    平均1.6911.6721.6920.020
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   龙门山断裂东侧台站波速比平均值对比表

    Table  2   Average velocity ratios for the stations in the east of Longmenshan fault zone

    台站震级下限波速比 总平均值方差样本 组数汶川地震前波 速比总平均值汶川地震后波 速比总平均值汶川地震前后 波速比变化量
    仲家沟ML≥2.51.6590.02045471.6461.6600.016
    安县ML≥2.51.6500.01839661.6771.649-0.028
    金鸡寺ML≥2.51.6530.02939721.6521.6530.001
    油榨坪ML≥2.51.6750.01834691.6771.675-0.002
    成都ML≥2.51.6660.01838391.6691.665-0.004
    平均1.6611.6641.660-0.004
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 蔡静观, 张喜玲. 1999. 丽江、 宁蒗强震波速比时空演化过程和数值分析[J]. 中国地震, 15 (1): 82-91

    Cai J G, Zhang X L. 1999. Time-space evolution pattern and numerical analysis of wave velocity ratio before Lijiang and Ninglang earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 15 (1): 82-91 (in Chinese)

    戴维乐. 1991. 菏泽5.9级地震前小震波速比时空变化特征[J]. 西北地震学报, 13 (1): 30-34

    Dai W L. 1991. Temporal and spatial anomaly characteristics of wave velocity ratios of small earthquakes before the Heze earthquake with MS5.9[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 13 (1): 30-34 (in Chinese)

    刁桂岺, 周仕勇, 刘杰, 张学民, 李晓峰, 张民. 2005. 岫岩地震序列的平均波速比前兆异常[J]. 华北地震科学, 23 (4): 1-5

    Diao G L, Zhou S Y, Liu J, Zhang X M, Li X F, Zhang M. 2005. Anomalies of mean vP/vS ratio in the series of Xiuyan earthquake[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 23 (4): 1-5 (in Chinese)

    冯德益, 王周元, 顾瑾平, 盛国英, 李克龙. 1980. 1976年四川省松潘-平武地震前波速比的异常变化[J]. 地震学报, 2 (1): 43-54

    Feng D Y, Wang Z Y, Gu J P, Sheng G Y, Li K L. 1980. Anomalous variations of seismic velocity ratio before the Songpan-Pingwu earthquake (M=7.2) of 1976[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2 (1): 43-54 (in Chinese)

    冯德益. 1981. 地震波速异常[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 34-37, 55-61

    Feng D Y. 1981. Velocity Anomalies of Seismic Waves[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 34-37, 55-61 (in Chinese)

    冯锐, 庞庆衍, 傅征祥, 郑建中, 孙次昌, 李宝祥. 1976. 海城地震前后地震波速比的变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 19 (4): 295-305

    Feng R, Pang Q Y, Fu Z X, Zheng J Z, Sun C C, Li B X. 1976. Variations of vP/vS before and after the Haicheng earthquake of 1975[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 19 (4): 295-305 (in Chinese)

    顾瑾平, 盛国英. 1983. 多台求波速比方法的再探讨[J]. 西北地震学报, 5 (4): 95-98

    Gu J P, Sheng G Y. 1983. A method for further studying the seismic velocity ratio anomalies[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 5 (4): 95-98 (in Chinese)

    姜秀娥, 陈非比. 1981. 用四震相法讨论唐山大震的波速异常[J]. 地球物理学报, 24 (1): 107-116

    Jiang X E, Chen F B. 1981. The discussion of velocity change of Tangshan earthquake using simple four phase method[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 24 (1): 107-116 (in Chinese)

    黎明晓, 刘杰. 2006. 云南地区地震序列的波速比(vP/vS)异常的研究[J]. 地震, 26 (1): 26-34

    Li M X, Liu J. 2006. Study on velocity ratio (vP/vS) anomaly of earthquake sequences in Yunnan region[J]. Earthquake, 26 (1): 26-34 (in Chinese)

    李善邦. 1981. 中国地震[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 522

    Li S B. 1981. Earthquake Research in China[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 522 (in Chinese)

    李永莉, 毛惠玲, 苏有锦. 2009. 滇西地区近期强震的波速比异常演化[J]. 地震研究, 32 (1): 6-11

    Li Y L, Mao H L, Su Y J. 2009. Evolution of wave velocity ratio anomaly before current strong earthquakes in west Yunnan[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 32 (1): 6-11 (in Chinese)

    龙海英, 聂小红, 唐兰兰. 2011. 新疆乌苏5.1级地震前波速比异常震例研究[J]. 地震研究, 34 (2): 126-130

    Long H Y, Nie X H, Tang L L. 2011. Study of the abnormity of wave velocity ratio before MS5.1 Wusu earthquake in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 34 (2): 126-130 (in Chinese)

    姚家骏, 王培玲, 刘文邦. 2012. 玉树7.1级地震前后波速比变化特征分析[J]. 高原地震, 24 (3): 6-10

    Yao J J, Wang P L, Liu W B. 2012. Analysis on the variation of wave velocity ratio before and after Yushu MS7.1 earthquake[J]. Plateau Earthquake Research, 24 (3): 6-10 (in Chinese)

    王林瑛, 郭永霞, 刘芳, 蒋长胜. 2008. 文安地震前后首都圈分区波速比研究[J]. 地震学报, 30 (3): 240-253

    Wang L Y, Guo Y X, Liu F, Jiang C S. 2008. Temporal vP/vS variation characteristics in different zone of China's Capital area before and after 2006 Wen'an earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 30 (3): 240-253 (in Chinese)

    张天中, 高阿甲, 黄蓉良, 刘庆芳. 2000. 震源介质参数的连续监测及其在张北地震前的变化[J]. 地震, 20 (增刊): 154-161
    Zhang T Z, Gao A J, Huang R L, Liu Q F. 2000. Continuous monitoring of focal medium parameters and their changed before Zhangbei earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 20 (Suppl. ): 154-161 (in Chinese)张小涛, 吕坚, 马广庆, 靳玉科, 张建国. 2006. 九江-瑞昌地震序列的波速比特征研究[J]. 华北地震科学, 24 (4): 36- 40

    Zhang X T, Lü J, Ma G Q, Jin Y K, Zhang J G. 2006. Characteristics of vP/vS ratio in the series of Jiujiang-Ruichang earthquake[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 24 (4): 36-40 (in Chinese)

    邹振轩, 李金龙, 俞铁宏. 2006. 应用多台和达法测定温州珊溪水库地区地震的平均波速比[J]. 地震, 26 (4): 133-137

    Zou Z X, Li J L, Yu T H. 2006. Determining average seismic wave velocity ratios (vP/vS) in Shanxi reservoir of Wenzhou region by using multi-station method[J]. Earthquake, 26 (4): 133-137 (in Chinese)

    Baisch S, Bokelmann G. 2001. Seismic waveform attributes before and after the Loma Prieta earthquake: Scattering change near the earthquake and temporal recovery[J]. J Geophys Res, 106 (B8): 16323-16337

    Li Y G, Chen P, Cochran E S, Vidale J E and Burdette T. 2006. Seismic evidence for rock damage and healing on the San Anderas fault associated with the 2004 M6.0 Parkfield earthquake[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 96 (4B): 349-363

    Li Y G, Chen P, Cochran E S, Vidale J E. 2007. Seismic velocity variations on the San Andreas fault caused by the 2004 M6 Parkfield earthquake and their implications[J]. Earth Planet Space, 59 : 21-31

    Niu F L, Silver P G, Daley T M, Cheng X, Majer E L. 2008. Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfield SAFOD drill site[J]. Nature, 454 : 204-209

    Nur A. 1972. Dilatancy, pore fluids, and premonitory variations of tS/tP travel times[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 62 (5): 1217-1222

    Poupinet G, Ellsworth W, Frechet J. 1984. Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublet: An application to the Calaveras fault, California[J]. J Geophys Res, 89 (B7): 5719-5731.

    Ratdomopurbo A, Poupinet G. 1995. Monitoring a temporal change of seismic velocity in a volcano: Application to the 1992 eruption of Mt.Merapi (Indonesia)[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 22 (7): 775-778

    Schaff D P, Beroza G C. 2004. Coseismic and postseismic velocity changes measured by repeating earthquake[J]. J Geophys Res, 109 (B10): B10302

    Whitcomb J H, Garmany J D, Anderson D L. 1973. Earthquake prediction: Variation of seismic velocities before the San-Fernando earthquake[J]. Science, 180 (4086): 632-635

  • 期刊类型引用(13)

    1. 颜心园,卢元刚,王琳. 行波效应下大跨度多塔斜拉桥随机地震响应研究. 工程与建设. 2021(06): 1287-1289 . 百度学术
    2. 黎璟,杨华平,钱永久,龚婉婷. 非一致激励下大跨度铁路斜拉桥地震响应规律. 铁道建筑. 2019(06): 14-16+32 . 百度学术
    3. 林家浩,张亚辉,赵岩. 虚拟激励法在国内外工程界的应用回顾与展望. 应用数学和力学. 2017(01): 1-32 . 百度学术
    4. 阮锦发. 全漂浮体系双塔混凝土斜拉桥地震响应分析. 福建建设科技. 2016(06): 19-23 . 百度学术
    5. 杨吉新,马璐珂,高辉,黎建华,刘佩. CFRP索斜拉桥地震波行波效应分析. 工程与建设. 2016(05): 649-653 . 百度学术
    6. 张凡,颜晓伟,李帅,王景全. 考虑波速影响的斜拉桥非一致激励地震响应研究. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2016(04): 60-68 . 百度学术
    7. 黄学漾,宗周红,夏坚,黎雅乐,夏樟华. 强震作用下独塔斜拉桥模型的非线性动力响应分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2015(02): 354-359 . 百度学术
    8. 李伟立,余报楚. 行波效应在桥梁抗震性能分析中的应用. 淮海工学院学报(自然科学版). 2015(03): 68-71 . 百度学术
    9. 孙才志,赵雷,王菲. 大跨度多塔斜拉桥随机地震响应分析. 地震工程学报. 2014(04): 911-918 . 百度学术
    10. 许莉,郑旭霞. 非一致地震激励下大跨斜拉桥的地震反应. 福州大学学报(自然科学版). 2013(04): 528-533 . 百度学术
    11. 方诗圣,康小方,王建国,王伟. 行波效应对大跨度斜拉桥地震反应的影响. 桥梁建设. 2013(01): 23-29 . 百度学术
    12. 宋刚,汪飞澜. 多点演变随机激励下连续刚构桥地震响应. 土木工程学报. 2013(S2): 249-254 . 百度学术
    13. 宋刚,梁伟业. 行波激励下斜交拱桥地震响应分析. 中国高新技术企业. 2012(13): 13-15 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(23)

图(14)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  606
  • HTML全文浏览量:  243
  • PDF下载量:  30
  • 被引次数: 36
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-05-15
  • 修回日期:  2013-09-04
  • 发布日期:  2013-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回