Structural features and activity in the east segment of Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone
-
摘要: 在野外实测工作基础上, 对香山北缘活动断裂带东段自晚更新世以来的水平活动强度分时、 分段进行了研究. 结果表明, 该断裂带东段自晚更新世以来, 总体水平活动强度不大: 晚更新世早—中期水平位移速率为1.44 mm/a, 晚期水平位移速率为0.53 mm/a, 全新世水平位移速率为1.01 mm/a. 该断裂带左旋走滑强度在走向上具有不均一性, 而且其活动强度的最大部位(活动中心)随时间向东发生迁移, 碱沟—刘岗井次级断层是现今活动强度最大的次级断层.Abstract: Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone, mainly characterized by sinistral strike-slip faults with a little dip-slip component in the Holocene, is one of the important active faults of arc structural belt in the northeast margin of Tibetan Plateau. The fault zone consists of nine discontinuous secondary faults and is divided into eastern and western segment by the Yiwanquan discontinuity. Based on the field survey, the study on active intensity of the eastern segment of the fault zone since the Late Pleistocene has been conducted in different periods. The results show that the active intensity of the east segment since the Late Pleistocene is not strong because the average horizontal displacement rates are 1.44, 0.53 and 1.01 mm/a in early-middle stage of Late Pleistocene, late stage of Late Pleistocene, and Holocene, respectively. The sinistral strike-slips of the faults distribute inhomogeneously along the strike, and the location of the maximal slip (the center of the activation) displaced eastward, resulting in the Jiangou-Liugangjing secondary fault being the most active part up to now.
-
-
图 1 香山北缘活动断裂带地理位置图
F1: 景泰小红山次级断层; F2: 罐罐岭次级断层; F3: 沙井次级断层; F4: 中卫小红山次级断层; F5: 青山—孤山子次级断层; F6: 西梁头—长流水沟口次级断层; F7: 窑沟—粉石沟次级断层; F8: 窟窿山—碱沟次级断层; F9: 碱沟—刘岗井次级断层
Figure 1. Geographical location of the Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone
F1: Xiaohongshan secondary fault in Jingtai; F2: Guanguanling secondary fault; F3: Shajing secondary fault; F4: Xiaohongshan secondary fault in Zhongwei; F5: Qingshan-Gushanzi secondary fault; F6: Xiliangtou- Changliushuigou mouth secondary fault; F7: Yaogou-Fenshigou secondary fault; F8: Kulongshan-Jiangou secondary fault; F9: Jiangou-Liugangjing secondary fault
图 3 F6与F7断层及其野外特征
(a) 长流水沟石炭纪地层逆冲于晚更新世地层之上(镜向东); (b) 窑沟石炭纪地层 逆冲于中新世地层之上(镜向西)
Figure 3. Faults F6 and F7 and their field characteristics
(a) Carboniferous overlaps on top of Upper Pleistocene in Changliushuigou (view to the east); (b) Carboniferous overlaps on top of Miocene in Yaogou (view to the west)
图 4 红谷梁断层剖面图
Q3p: 上更新统黄土夹砾石层; N1: 中新统砂砾岩; C3: 上石炭统砂岩夹煤线; O2-3: 中上奥陶统灰绿色砂岩
Figure 4. Profile of Hongguliang fault
Q3p: Layer of loess intercalated with gravel of Upper Pleistocene; N1: Sandy conglomerate of Miocene; C3: Sandstone intercalated with coal seam of Upper Carboniferous; O2-3: Gray green sandstone of Middle-Upper Ordovician
图 6 碱沟—阴洞沟中新统与中上奥陶统不整合面水平位移图
Q3eolp: 上更新统风积黏质砂土; N1: 中新 统黏质砂土; O2-3: 中上奥陶统砂岩
Figure 6. Horizontal displacement of unconformity between Miocene and Middle-Upper Ordovician in Jiangou-Yindonggou
Q3eolp: Aeolian clayey sand of Upper Pleistocene; N1: Clayey sand of Miocene; O2-3: Sandstone of Middle-Upper Ordovician
表 1 各级冲沟特征简表
Table 1 Characteristics of different levels of gullies
表 2 香山北缘活动断裂带东段水平位移统计表
Table 2 Statistics of horizontal displacements in the east segment of Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone
表 3 香山北缘活动断裂带东段各级冲沟的水平位移量
Table 3 The horizontal displacement of different level gullies in the east segment of Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone
表 4 香山北缘活动断裂带东段不同时间点以来的水平位移速率
Table 4 Horizontal displacement rates of the east segment of Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone since 100, 30, 9 ka BP
表 5 香山北缘活动断裂带东段不同时期的水平位移速率
Table 5 Horizontal displacement rates of the east segment of Xiangshan northern margin active fault zone in different periods
-
柴炽章, 张维歧, 焦德成. 1997. 天景山断裂带晚第四纪水平活动强度的分时、 分段研究[J]. 中国地震, 13 (1): 36-41. Chai C Z, Zhang W Q, Jiao D C. 1997. Discussion of the level active severity in different time intervals and segments on Late Quaternary along Tianjingshan fault zone[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 13 (1): 36-41 (in Chinese).
柴炽章, 焦德成, 廖玉华, 张思源, 杜鹏, 沈卫华. 2003. 宁、 蒙、 甘交界罐罐岭发现地震地表破裂带[J]. 地震地质, 25 (1): 167-168. Chai C Z, Jiao D C, Liao Y H, Zhang S Y, Du P, Shen W H. 2003. Discovery of surface rupture zone produced by Guanguanling earthquake at the juncture of Ningxia, Inner Mongolia and Gansu province[J]. Seismology and Geology, 25 (1) : 167-168 (in Chinese).
柴炽章, 张维岐, 焦德成. 1998. 天景山断裂带前锋区第四纪构造变形及成因分析[J]. 中国地震, 14 (2): 150-156. Chai C Z, Zhang W Q, Jiao D C. 1998. Quaternary structure feature in forward area of Tianjingshan fault zone and its contributing factor analysis[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 14 (2): 150-156 (in Chinese).
程绍平, 彭贵, 李洪春. 1984. 宁夏海原南华山北麓断裂带的冲沟断错与8.5级强震重复率[J]. 地震地质, 6 (4): 25-36. Chen S P, Peng G, Li H C. 1984. Offset gullies and recurrence time of M8.5 strong earthquakes along the fault zone of northern piedmont of Nanhua Mountain, Haiyuan, Ningxia[J]. Seismology and Geology, 6 (4): 25-36 (in Chinese).
楚全芝. 2009. 中卫断裂带断层类型划分及其构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 83 (9): 1221-1230. Chu Q Z. 2009. Classification of faults in the Zhongwei fault zone and its tectonic implication[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 83 (9): 1221-1230 (in Chinese).
杜鹏, 柴炽章, 沈卫华, 闵伟, 田勤俭. 2007. 罐罐岭断裂带最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 29 (3): 597-604. Du P, Chai C Z, Shen W H, Min W, Tian Q J. 2007. Characteristics of the Holocene activity of the Guanguanling fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29 (3): 597-604 (in Chinese).
国家地震局地质研究所, 宁夏回族自治区地震局. 1990. 海原活动断裂带[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 117-120. Institute of Geology, State Seismological Bureau, Earthquake Administration of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. 1990. Haiyuan Active Fault Belt[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 117-120 (in Chinese).
闵伟, 张培震, 邓起东. 2001. 中卫-同心断裂带全新世古地震研究[J]. 地震地质, 23 (3): 357-366. Min W, Zhang P Z, Deng Q D. 2001. The study of Holocene paleoearthquakes on Zhongwei-Tongxin fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 23 (3): 357-366 (in Chinese).
宋方敏, 朱世龙, 汪一鹏, 邓起东, 张维歧. 1983. 1920年海原地震中的最大水平位移及西华山北缘断裂地震重复率的估计[J]. 地震地质, 5 (4): 29-37. Song F M, Zhu S L, Wang Y P, Deng Q D, Zhang W Q. 1983. The maximum horizontal displacement in the Haiyuan earthquake of 1920 and the estimation of the earthquake recurrence along the northern marginal fault of the Xihuashan[J]. Seismology and Geology, 5 (4): 29-37 (in Chinese).
汪一鹏, 宋方敏, 李志义, 尤惠川, 安平. 1990. 宁夏香山-天景山断裂带晚第四纪强震重复间隔的研究[J]. 中国地震, 6 (2): 15-24. Wang Y P, Song F M, Li Z Y, You H C, An P. 1990. Study on recurrence intervals of great earthquakes in the Late Quaternary of Xiangshan-Tianjingshan fault zone in Ningxia[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 6 (2): 15-24 (in Chinese).
徐锡伟, 杨晓平, 杨忠东. 1996. 城市地震地质灾害及其预测问题初论[J]. 水文地质工程地质, (3): 32-35. Xu X W, Yang X P, Yang Z D. 1996. A preliminary discussion on seismogelogical hazards in cities and their prediction[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, (3): 32-35 (in Chinese).
杨明芝, 马禾青, 廖玉华. 2007. 宁夏地震活动与研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 29-32. Yang M Z, Ma H Q, Liao Y H. 2007. Ningxia Earthquake Activities and Research[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 29-32 (in Chinese).
张维歧, 焦德成, 柴炽章, 宋方敏, 汪一鹏. 1988. 宁夏香山-天景山断裂带新活动特征及1709年中卫南7 1/2 级地震形变带[J]. 地震地质, 10 (3): 12-19. Zhang W Q, Jiao D C, Chai C Z, Song F M, Wang Y P. 1988. Neotectonic features of the Xiangshan-Tianjingshan arc fracture zone and the seismic deformation zone of 1709 south of Zhongwei M=7 1/2 earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology, 10 (3): 12-19 (in Chinese).
周俊喜, 刘百篪. 1987. 中卫-同心活断层研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 9 (3): 71-76. Zhou J X, Liu B C. 1987. The research of Zhongwei-Tongxin fault[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 9 (3): 71 - 76 (in Chinese).
周特先. 1994. 宁夏构造地貌[M]. 银川: 宁夏人民出版社: 101-107. Zhou T X. 1994. Tectonic Landform in Ningxia[M]. Yinchuan: Ningxia People's Publishing House: 101-107 (in Chinese).
Wallace R E. 1970. Earthquake recurrence intervals on the San Andres fault[J]. Geol Soc Am Bull, 81 (10): 2875-2890.
Yeats R S, Sieh K E, Allen C R. 1997. The Geology of Earthquakes[M]. New York: Oxford University Press: 567-568.