王世广,胥广银,李帅,杨婷,石磊,张龙,唐方头,房立华. 2024. 2023年甘肃积石山MS6.2地震序列及发震构造分析. 地震学报,46(0):1−16. doi: 10.11939/jass.20230007
引用本文: 王世广,胥广银,李帅,杨婷,石磊,张龙,唐方头,房立华. 2024. 2023年甘肃积石山MS6.2地震序列及发震构造分析. 地震学报,46(0):1−16. doi: 10.11939/jass.20230007
Wang S G,Xu G Y,Li S,Yang T,Shi L,Zhang L,Tang F T,Fang L H. 2024. Analysis of earthquake sequence and seismogenic structure of the 2023 MS6.2 Jishishan earthquake, Gansu Province, China. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(0):1−16. doi: 10.11939/jass.20230007
Citation: Wang S G,Xu G Y,Li S,Yang T,Shi L,Zhang L,Tang F T,Fang L H. 2024. Analysis of earthquake sequence and seismogenic structure of the 2023 MS6.2 Jishishan earthquake, Gansu Province, China. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(0):1−16. doi: 10.11939/jass.20230007

2023年甘肃积石山MS6.2地震序列及发震构造分析

Analysis of earthquake sequence and seismogenic structure of the 2023 MS6.2 Jishishan earthquake, Gansu Province, China

  • 摘要: 2023年12月18日23时59分,甘肃省临夏州积石山县发生了MS6.2强震,震中位于柴达木—祁连块体东北缘拉脊山断裂系南段。本文基于地震重新定位与震源机制和应力反演对此次地震的发震构造进行了分析,并对区域危险性进行了初步探讨。通过甘肃区域地震台网和青海区域地震台网观测数据,利用双差定位方法对震后10天的地震序列进行重定位,共获得605个高精度定位结果,结果显示主震震中位置为35.748°N, 102.812°E,深度16.4 km。余震序列主要分布深度为6—15 km,在水平分布上表现为在震源区域长轴沿NW-SE向展布,逐渐向北转变为近NS向展布,深度剖面显示断层倾向NE。应用FocMech-Flow自动化反演震源机制流程,获得MS6.2主震的最佳双力偶解节面Ⅰ走向302°,倾角58°,滑动角45°;节面Ⅱ走向 184°, 倾角53°,滑动角138°,其中节面Ⅰ走向与震源区附近余震展布方向一致,可判定为发震断层面。应力场反演结果表明震源区应力性质主要为逆冲型,最大主应力轴为WSW-ENE向。结合区域重力异常和已有地质资料,本文认为发震断层为积石山东缘断裂系中的一条深度较深的反冲断层,并将其命名为“大河家断裂”。现有历史地震资料表明,近年来柴达木—祁连块体发生的强震具有向东迁移的趋势,此次地震的发生,暗示了位于积石山东部的西秦岭北缘断裂带未来的强震危险性增加。

     

    Abstract:
    On December 18th, 2023 at 23:59, an earthquake MS6.2 occurred in Jishishan County, Linxia Prefecture, Gansu Province, with the epicenter located near the southern segment of the Lajishan fault system in the eastern Qidam-Qilian block. In this paper, we conducted the relocation, focal mechanism and stress inversion methods to analyze the seismic structure and regional seismic hazard, . Using digital waveform data from the Seismic Networks of Gansu and Qinghai provinces, the double-difference location algorithm was conducted on the earthquake sequence within 10 days after the earthquake.
    A total of 605 high-precision relocation of earthquakes was revealed and the epicenter of mainshock was determined to be at 35.748°E, 102.812°N, with a depth of 16.4 km. Most of aftershocks are located at depths of 6~15 km with spreading along NW-SE direction near the mainshock epicenter, while some aftershocks gradually turn along aboutNS direction northward. Depth profile of aftershocks further suggest that the seismogenic fault plane dips to NE. By applying the FocMech-Flow automatic inversion of focal mechanism, the best double-couple solution for the M6.2 mainshock was obtained. The parameters of two nodal planes are as follows, strike 302°, dip 58°, rake 45° for nodal plane I and strike184°, dip 53°, rake of 138° for nodal plane II. Stress field inversion results indicated that the stress in the epicenter belongs to thrust-type and the azimuth of σ1 axis orients WSW-ENE. Consistent with the direction of aftershock distribution near the mainshock, the plane I is considered as the fault plane responsible for this earthquake. Combining previous geological data, we suggest that the seismogenic fault is a deeply buried back thrust fault segment of the East Jishishan Fault and named it as “Dahejia Fault”. Historical earthquake records in the Qidam-Qilian block show that the strong earthquakes gradually migrate eastward in recent two decades. Therefore, this earthquake further enhances the seismic hazards of the West Qiling fault to the east of Jishishan.

     

/

返回文章
返回