Niu Linlin1,2) Du Jianjun1,2) Feng Chengjun1,2) Meng Wen1,2) Li Guoqi1,2) Chen Qunce1,2). 2015: In-situ stress measurement of deep borehole in east of Hebei and its significance. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(1): 89-102. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.01.008
Citation: Niu Linlin1,2) Du Jianjun1,2) Feng Chengjun1,2) Meng Wen1,2) Li Guoqi1,2) Chen Qunce1,2). 2015: In-situ stress measurement of deep borehole in east of Hebei and its significance. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(1): 89-102. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.01.008

In-situ stress measurement of deep borehole in east of Hebei and its significance

More Information
  • Published Date: February 01, 2015
  • In order to obtain the required basic information of crustal stress for exploitation and design of deepmine, Institute of Geomechanics of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences carried out hydrofracturing in-situ stress measurements in three boreholes near Luanxian and Laoting fault in east of Hebei area successively in 2012 and 2013. The three boreholes are between 500—1 000 m in depth. The results of the stress measurements preliminarily revealed the distribution regularity of current in-situ stress in shallow crust of study area. The measured data show that the dominant direction of regional stress field is NW70°; the ratio of the maximum shear stress to the average stress of the three boreholes is in the range of 0.24—0.48 and the average values of the ratio are 0.30, 0.40, 0.30 for the three boreholes, which are less than 0.6,that is the friction limit state of earth’s crust stress. But the ratio got shortly after the Tangshan MS7.8 earthquake is large, few of them are greater than 0.6, and the average value is 0.44, which reveals that the stress accumulation degree in the study area was low and stress has been completely released. According to the friction criterion of faults and Byerlee law, the risk of a large seismic activity in the study area is in low risk.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 赵元鑫,李营,陈志,路畅,刘兆飞. 唐山断裂带气体组分变异函数空间分布特征. 地震. 2022(01): 18-32 .
    2. 吴基文,张文永,彭华,翟晓荣,沈书豪,孙贵,毕尧山. 淮南煤田潘集煤矿外围勘查区水压致裂地应力测量研究. 工程地质学报. 2021(04): 972-984 .
    3. 上官拴通,孙东生,张国斌,杨跃辉,齐晓飞,陈东方,乔永超,李阿伟,陈群策. 唐山地区3~4 km深部地应力测量及断层稳定性分析. 地质学报. 2021(12): 3915-3925 .
    4. 丰成君,戚帮申,王晓山,张鹏,孙明乾,孟静,谭成轩,陈群策. 基于原地应力实测数据探讨华北典型强震区断裂活动危险性及其对雄安新区的影响. 地学前缘. 2019(04): 170-190 .
    5. 张雪. 浅析地质测量在矿产资源勘查中的重要性. 世界有色金属. 2017(19): 55+57 .
    6. 丰成君,张鹏,孟静,戚帮申,秦向辉,牛琳琳,孙东生,孙炜峰,谭成轩,陈群策. 郯庐断裂带及邻区深孔地应力测量与地震地质意义. 地球物理学进展. 2017(03): 946-967 .
    7. 李鹏,郭奇峰,苗胜军,蔡美峰. 浅部和深部工程区地应力场及断裂稳定性比较. 哈尔滨工业大学学报. 2017(09): 10-16 .
    8. 丰成君,张鹏,戚帮申,孟静,谭成轩,胡道功. 郯庐断裂带附近地壳浅层现今构造应力场. 现代地质. 2017(01): 46-70 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1164) PDF downloads (87) Cited by(12)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return