Advanced Search
Xiang Yang, Sun Xiaolong, Yang Pengtao. 2017: Coseismic response of water level in Xin10 well caused by MS6.7 Akto, Xinjiang, earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(6): 899-909. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.06.008
Citation: Xiang Yang, Sun Xiaolong, Yang Pengtao. 2017: Coseismic response of water level in Xin10 well caused by MS6.7 Akto, Xinjiang, earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(6): 899-909. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2017.06.008
shu

Coseismic response of water level in Xin10 well caused by MS6.7 Akto, Xinjiang, earthquake

  • 1.

    Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China

  • 2.

    Earthquake Administration of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Vrümqi 830002, China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 16, 2016
  • Revised Date: June 26, 2017
  • Published Date: October 31, 2017
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • A hydroseismogram induced by the Akto MS6.7 earthquake in Xinjiang on November 25, 2016 was recorded by digital high frequency sampling level gauge. We comparatively analyzed the correlation characteristics between the water level and the vertical ground motion, and the relationship between the above two and the hydrological parameters of well-aquifer system was carried out by a thorough discussion. The results suggested that: ① similar to the seismic signal, there are two significant periods, 6--10 s and 15--30 s in the hydroseismogram of Xin10 well induced by the Akto MS6.7 earthquake. ② overall, the response amplitude of hydroseismogram in Xin10 well was positively correlated to the amplitude of vertical ground motion, and the amplitude ratio of the two increased with the reduction in frequency at high frequency (greater than 0.08 Hz), which indicated that the water level of Xin10 well could enlarge signals with period more than 12 s more effectively. ③ permeability coefficient of Xin10 well-aquifer system was estimated at about 10-2 cm/s by using the amplitude ratio of the hydroseismogram and seismic waves, and the hydrogeological parameters in aquifer also fluctuated during the process of seismic wave action. The results in this paper also showed that the coseismic response mechanism of well water level is more complicated, and high sampling rate of water level data is the guarantee to obtain reliable results and knowledge in coseismic response of water level analysis.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (33)
  • 刘序俨, 郑小菁, 王林, 季颖锋. 2009.承压井水位观测系统对体应变的响应机制分析[J].地球物理学报, 52(12): 3147-3157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.12.025.
    Liu X Y, Zheng X J, Wang L, Ji Y F. 2009. Response analysis of the well-water-level system in confined aquifer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 52(12): 3147-3157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.12.025 (in Chinese).
    舒优良, 张世民, 黄辅琼. 2006.印尼8.7级和8.5级两次强震周至深井的震时效应研究[J].地震地磁观测与研究, 27(2): 16-22. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-FZJS200502015.htm
    Shu Y L, Zhang S M, Huang F Q. 2006. A study on earthquake-time effect of Zhouzhi deep borehole on two strong earthquakes: Magnitude 8.7 and magnitude 8.5 in Indonesia[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 27(2): 16-22 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1007/s11589-009-0149-4
    舒优良, 张世民, 黄辅琼. 2014.汶川8.0级地震周至深井水震波的记录特征[J].震灾防御技术, 9(增刊): 572-580. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zzfy2014s1002&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    Shu Y L, Zhang S M, Huang F Q. 2014. Characteristics of water level depth vibration of Zhouzhi deep well during Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 9(S): 572-580 (in Chinese). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195116304905
    Barbour A J. 2015. Pore pressure sensitivities to dynamic strains: Observations in active tectonic regions[J]. J Geophys Res, 120(8): 5863-5883. doi: 10.1002/2015JB012201
    Blanchard F B, Byerly P. 1935. A study of a well gauge as a seismograph[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 25(40): 313-321. http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/25/4/313
    Brodsky E E, Roeloffs E A, Woodcock D, Gall I, Manga M. 2003. A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 108(B8): 2390. doi: 10.1029/2002JB002321.
    Cooper Jr H H, Bredehoeft J D, Papadopulos I S, Bennett R R. 1965. The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves[J]. J Geophys Res, 70(16): 3915-3926. doi: 10.1029/JZ070i016p03915.
    Eaton J P, Takasaki K J. 1959. Seismological interpretation of earthquake-induced water-level fluctuations in wells[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 49(3): 227-245. http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/49/3/227
    Elkhoury J E, Brodsky E E, Agnew D C. 2006. Seismic waves increase permeability[J]. Nature, 441(7097): 1135-1138. doi: 10.1038/nature04798.
    Elkhoury J E, Niemeijer A, Brodsky E E, Marone C. 2011. Laboratory observations of permeability enhancement by fluid pressure oscillation of in situ fractured rock[J]. J Geophys Res, 116(B2): B02311. doi: 10.1029/2010JB007759.
    He A H, Fan X F, Zhao G, Liu Y, Singh R P, Hu Y L. 2017. Co-seismic response of water level in the Jingle well (China) associated with the Gorkha Nepal (MW7.8) earthquake[J]. Tectonophysics, 714/715: 82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.08.019.
    Hsieh P A, Bredehoeft J D, Farr J M. 1987. Determination of aquifer transmissivity from earth tide analysis[J]. Water Resour Res, 23(10): 1824-1832. doi: 10.1029/WR023i010p01824
    Liu L B, Roeloffs E, Zheng X Y. 1989. Seismically induced water level fluctuations in the Wali well, Beijing, China[J]. J Geophys Res, 94(B7): 9453-9462. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB07p09453.
    Ma Y C, Huang F Q. 2017. Coseismic water level changes induced by two distant earthquakes in multiple wells of the Chinese mainland[J]. Tectonophysics, 694: 57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.11.040
    Manga M, Beresnev I, Brodsky E E, Elkhoury J E, Elsworth D, Ingebritsen S E, Mays D C, Wang C Y. 2012. Changes in permeability caused by transient stresses: Field observations, experiments, and mechanisms[J]. Rev Geophys, 50(2): RG2004. doi: 10.1029/2011RG000382.
    Manga M, Wang C Y, Shirzaei M. 2016. Increased stream discharge after the 3 September 2016 MW5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma earthquake[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 43(22): 11588-11594. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071268.
    Mays D C. 2010. Contrasting clogging in granular media filters, soils, and dead-end membranes[J]. J Environ Eng, 136(5): 475-480. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000173.
    Montgomery D R, Manga M. 2003. Streamflow and water well responses to earthquakes[J]. Science, 300: 2047-2049. doi: 10.1126/science.1082980.
    Pride S R, Berryman J G, Harris J M. 2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow[J]. J Geophys Res, 109(B1): B01201. doi: 10.1029/2003JB002639.
    Rexin E E, Oliver J, Prentiss D. 1962. Seismically-induced fluctuations of the water level in the Nunn-Bush Well in Milwaukee[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 52(1): 17-25. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/52/1/17/101282/seismically-induced-fluctuations-of-the-water?redirectedFrom=fulltext
    Shalev E, Kurzon I, Doan M L, Lyakhovsky V. 2015. Water-level oscillations caused by volumetric and deviatoric dynamic strains[J]. Geophys J Int, 204(2): 841-851. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016GeoJI.204..841S
    Shi Z, Wang G, Manga M, Wang C Y. 2015. Continental-scale water-level response to a large earthquake[J]. Geofluids, 15(1/2): 310-320. doi: 10.1111/gfl.12099/abstract
    Shih D C F, Wu Y M, Chang C H. 2013. Significant coherence for groundwater and Rayleigh waves: Evidence in spectral response of groundwater level in Taiwan using 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Japan[J]. J Hydrol, 486: 57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.013
    Stockwell R G, Mansinha L, Lowe R P. 1996. Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform[J]. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 44(4): 998-1001. doi: 10.1109/78.492555
    Sun X L, Wang G C, Yang X H. 2015. Coseismic response of water level in Changping well, China, to the MW9.0 Tohoku earthquake[J]. J Hydrol, 531: 1028-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.005
    Wang C Y, Wang C H, Manga M. 2004. Coseismic release of water from mountains: Evidence from the 1999 (MW7.5) Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake[J]. Geology, 32(9): 769-772. doi: 10.1130/G20753.1.
    Weingarten M, Ge S M. 2014. Insights into water level response to seismic waves: A 24 year high-fidelity record of global seismicity at Devils Hole[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 41(1): 74-80. doi: 10.1002/2013GL058418
    Yan R, Woith H, Wang R J. 2014. Groundwater level changes induced by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake in China mainland[J]. Geophys J Int, 199(1): 533-548. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu196
    Yan R, Wang G C, Shi Z M. 2016. Sensitivity of hydraulic properties to dynamic strain within a fault damage zone[J]. J Hydrol, 543: 721-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.043
    Zhang Y, Fu L Y, Huang F Q, Chen X Z. 2015. Coseismic water-level changes in a well induced by teleseismic waves from three large earthquakes[J]. Tectonophysics, 651: 232-241. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004019511500195X
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 贾永斌，闫玮，祖丽皮牙·艾尼瓦尔，汪成国. 乌什M_S7.1地震引起新55井、新46井水位水温同震响应分析. 内陆地震. 2024(02): 158-165 .
    2. 梁卉，高小其，颜龙. 2023年2月6日土耳其两次7.8级地震引起的井水位同震响应对比分析. 地震. 2024(03): 96-107 .
    3. 洪旭瑜，陈祥开，秦双龙，林加宝. M_S≥6.0地震引起的永安井水位同震响应特征研究. 华南地震. 2023(03): 39-45 .
    4. 毛巍颖. 云南思茅大寨井与大理月溪井水位同震响应对比分析. 华南地震. 2022(01): 31-37 .
    5. 孙小龙，刘耀炜，付虹，晏锐. 我国地震地下流体学科分析预报研究进展回顾. 地震研究. 2020(02): 216-231+417 .
    6. 赵頔，张宝匀，丁谋谋，孙云山. 北京昌平井水位对日本M_W9.0地震的响应. 内陆地震. 2020(04): 347-354 .
    7. 方震，黄显良，汪小厉，杨源源，倪红玉，张彬. 庐江地热温泉1号井水氡远场强震震后效应及机理分析. 地震学报. 2020(06): 732-744+782 . 本站查看
    8. 陆丽娜，李静，薛红盼，汪啸，张雷，王建. 赵各庄井地下流体的映震响应. 震灾防御技术. 2019(01): 174-190 .
    9. 崔瑾，丁风和，曾宪伟，司学芸. 宁夏井水位观测同震响应特征研究及机理探讨. 地球物理学进展. 2019(04): 1281-1287 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1415) PDF downloads (45) Cited by(13)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return