Advanced Search
Wang L W，Zhang Y，Zhang X G，Hu Z. 2023. Characteristics of subway stray current in geoelectrical resistivity observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica，45（2）：285−301. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210197
Citation: Wang L W，Zhang Y，Zhang X G，Hu Z. 2023. Characteristics of subway stray current in geoelectrical resistivity observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica，45（2）：285−301. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20210197
shu

Characteristics of subway stray current in geoelectrical resistivity observation

  • Institute of Earthquake Forecasting，China Earthquake Administration，Beijing 100036，China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 28, 2021
  • Revised Date: February 22, 2022
  • Available Online: September 01, 2022
  • Published Date: March 14, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The geoelectrical resistivity observation is one of the most important methods in the study of earthquake precursor, and the characteristics of the stray current during subway operation in the geoelectrical resistivity observation are useful for analyzing the geoelectric observation data and the anomaly variation before earthquakes. Based on the study on the generation mechanism, the quantitatively results of the influence of stray current on geoelectrical resistivity observation were given in this paper. The result shows that the effect distance can reach dozens or even a hundred kilometers. Through monitoring the stray current in some geoelectrical resistivity observation stations around cities, such as Tongzhou station in Beijing, Qingguang, Baodi and Tanggu stations in Tianjin, Jiangning station in Jiangsu and Xinchengzi station in Liaoning, the amplitude and frequency range of the stray current signal as well as its spatial distribution characteristics were analyzed. It shows that the amplitude of the signal ranges from several to tens millivolt, and the period range is mainly from 50 s to 200 s. Due to the influence of stray current, the signal-to-noise ratio is decreased by 10 to 30 dB, and the accuracy of the observation data is more than 20 times worse than the specified requirement. According to the characteristics of the stray current propagation, several methods which can be used to suppress the signal were proposed in this paper, and it will provide a foundation for the identification of anomaly information from the observation data and anti-interference technology study.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (53)
  • 董亮,姚知林,葛彩刚,石超杰,陈金泽. 2021. 地铁杂散电流干扰下管地电位波动特征的傅里叶分析[J]. 表面技术,50(2):294–303. doi: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2021.02.031
    Dong L,Yao Z L,Ge C G,Shi C J,Chen J Z. 2021. Fourier analysis of the fluctuation characteristics of pipe-to-soil potential under metro stray current interference[J]. Surface Technology,50(2):294–303 (in Chinese).
    杜学彬,马占虎,叶青,谭大诚,陈军营. 2006. 与强地震有关的视电阻率各向异性变化[J]. 地球物理学进展,21(1):93–100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2006.01.015
    Du X B,Ma Z H,Ye Q,Tan D C,Chen J Y. 2006. Anisotropic changes in apparent resistivity associated with strong earthquakes[J]. Progress in Geophysics,21(1):93–100 (in Chinese).
    桂燮泰,关华平,戴经安. 1989. 唐山、松潘地震前视电阻率短临异常图象重现性[J]. 西北地震学报,11(4):71–75.
    Gui X T,Guan H P,Dai J A. 1989. The short-term and immediate anomalous pattern recurrences of the apparent resistivity before the Tangshan and Songpan earthquakes of 1976[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal,11(4):71–75 (in Chinese).
    胡先茂. 2011. 城市轨道交通对埋地管线影响范围的分析[J]. 现代城市轨道交通,(3):74–76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7533.2011.03.024
    Hu X M. 2011. Analysis on influence scope of urban rail transit on buried pipelines[J]. Modern Urban Transit,(3):74–76 (in Chinese).
    李金铭. 2005. 地电场与电法勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 60–67.
    Li J M. 2005. Geoelectric Field and Electrical Exploration[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House: 60–67 （in Chinese）.
    李雷,刘楠康,曾文,邵华锋. 2019. 轨道交通杂散电流在复杂地质条件下的分布[J]. 广东电力,32(8):133–140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-290X.2019.008.017
    Li L,Liu N K,Zeng W,Shao H F. 2019. Distribution of stray current in rail transit under complex geological conditions[J]. Guangdong Electric Power,32(8):133–140 (in Chinese).
    林江,唐华,于海学. 2002. 地铁迷流腐蚀及其防护技术[J]. 建筑材料学报,5(1):72–76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2002.01.014
    Lin J,Tang H,Yu H X. 2002. Protection of stray current corrosion in metro[J]. Journal of Building Materials,5(1):72–76 (in Chinese).
    刘国兴. 2005. 电法勘探原理与方法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 7–13.
    Liu G X. 2005. The Principle and Method of Electrical Exploration[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House: 7–13 （in Chinese）.
    刘文权. 2014. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制,28(11):29–32. doi: 10.13726/j.cnki.11-2706/tq.2014.11.029.04
    Liu W Q. 2014. Interference corrosion hazards of subway stray currents on buried jet fuel metal pipeline[J]. Total Corrosion Control,28(11):29–32 (in Chinese).
    马钦忠. 2014. 中外几次重要地震预测与预报结果之启示[J]. 地震学报,36(3):500–513. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.03.015
    Ma Q Z. 2014. Enlightment of the success or failure prediction for some large earthquakes at home and abroad[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,36(3):500–513 (in Chinese).
    毛先进,杨玲英,钱家栋. 2014. 水平层状介质中深埋装置系统地电阻率影响系数特征研究[J]. 地震学报,36(4):678–685. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2014.04.013
    Mao X J,Yang L Y,Qian J D. 2014. Characteristics of the influence coefficient in the cases of deeply-buried configurations for geoelectrical resistivity observation[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,36(4):678–685 (in Chinese).
    梅进武,林国松. 2017. 多列车运行情况下的地铁杂散电流分析[J]. 电气化铁道,28(4):68–70.
    Mei J W,Lin G S. 2017. Analysis of metro stray current under multi-train operation[J]. Electric Railway,28(4):68–70 (in Chinese).
    聂永安,巴振宁,聂瑶. 2010. 深埋电极的地电阻率观测研究[J]. 地震学报,32(1):33–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2010.01.004
    Nie Y A,Ba Z N,Nie Y. 2010. Study on buried electrode resistivity monitoring system[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,32(1):33–40 (in Chinese).
    钱复业,赵玉林,于谋明,王志贤,刘小伟,常思敏. 1982. 地震前地电阻率的异常变化[J]. 中国科学:B辑,(9):831–839.
    Qian F Y,Zhao Y L,Yu M M,Wang Z X,Liu X W,Chang S M. 1982. Geoelectrical resistivity anomalies before earthquake[J]. Science in China:Series B,(9):831–839 (in Chinese).
    钱家栋. 1993. 与大震孕育过程有关的地电阻率变化研究[J]. 中国地震,9(4):341–350.
    Qian J D. 1993. A study on the changes in geoelectrical resistivity associated with preparatory process of great earthquakes in China[J]. Earthquake Research in China,9(4):341–350 (in Chinese).
    钱家栋,马钦忠,李劭秾. 2013. 汶川MS8.0地震前成都台NE测线地电阻率异常的进一步研究[J]. 地震学报,35(1):4–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.002
    Qian J D,Ma Q Z,Li S N. 2013. Further study on the anomalies in apparent resistivity in the NE configuration at Chengdu station associated with Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,35(1):4–17 (in Chinese).
    澹台乐琰,韩肖清,王磊,袁铁江. 2020. 多列车运行下地铁杂散电流建模仿真[J]. 电测与仪表,57(22):7–16.
    Tantai L Y,Han X Q,Wang L,Yuan T J. 2020. Modeling and simulation of stray current in subway with multi-train operation[J]. Electrical Measurement &Instrumentation,57(22):7–16 (in Chinese).
    王崇林,马草原,王智,潘春德,王雨扬. 2007. 地铁直流牵引供电系统杂散电流分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,10(3):51–53.
    Wang C L,Ma C Y,Wang Z,Pan C D,Wang Y Y. 2007. Analysis of stray current in metro DC traction power system[J]. Urban Mass Transit,10(3):51–53 (in Chinese).
    王兰炜,张宇,张世中,颜蕊,王子影,张兴国,胡哲. 2015. 我国井下地电阻率观测技术现状分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,36(2):95–102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2015.02.018
    Wang L W,Zhang Y,Zhang S Z,Yan R,Wang Z Y,Zhang X G,Hu Z. 2015. The status of deep-well geo-electrical resistivity observation in China[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,36(2):95–102 (in Chinese).
    王兰炜,张宇,张兴国,胡哲,王子影,马小溪. 2019. 地震地电阻率交流观测方法及观测实验[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,39(7):738–742.
    Wang L W,Zhang Y,Zhang X G,Hu Z,Wang Z Y,Ma X X. 2019. AC geo-electrical resistivity observation method and experimental observation[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,39(7):738–742 (in Chinese).
    王猛. 2005. 直流牵引供电系统钢轨电位与杂散电流分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,8(3):24–26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-869X.2005.03.008
    Wang M. 2005. Rail potential and stray current of DC traction power system[J]. Urban Mass Transit,8(3):24–26 (in Chinese).
    张世中,石航,王兰炜,胡哲,刘大鹏,魏连生,鞠永. 2013. 地电台站受城市轨道交通干扰的测试分析与抗干扰措施研究[J]. 地震学报,35(1):117–124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.012
    Zhang S Z,Shi H,Wang L W,Hu Z,Liu D P,Wei L S,Ju Y. 2013. Test analysis on disturbances caused by urban rail transit at geoelectric stations and measures to reduce its influence[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,35(1):117–124 (in Chinese).
    张晓东,蒋海昆,李正媛,卢显,安艳茹. 2011. 汶川地震对地震预报工作的一些启示[J]. 工程研究:跨学科视野中的工程,3(4):309–320.
    Zhang X D,Jiang H K,Li Z Y,Lu X,An Y R. 2011. The revelation of Wenchuan earthquake for earthquake forecast[J]. Journal of Engineering Studies,3(4):309–320 (in Chinese).
    张宇,张兴国,王兰炜,马小溪,赵庆福,袁慎杰,王子影. 2016. 新型地电阻率交流观测系统研究及江宁台观测试验[J]. 地震学报,38(5):807–810. doi: 10.11939/jass.2016.05.015
    Zhang Y,Zhang X G,Wang L W,Ma X X,Zhao Q F,Yuan S J,Wang Z Y. 2016. A new AC geo-electrical resistivity observation system and experimental observation in Jiangning seismic station[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,38(5):807–810 (in Chinese).
    中国地震局. 2009. DB/T 33.1-2009地震地电观测方法地电阻率观测第1部分: 单极距观测[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 3.
    China Earthquake Administration. 2009. DB/T 33.1−2009 The Method of Earthquake-Related Geoelectrical Monitoring: Geoelectrical Resistivity Observation: Part 1: Single Separation Configuration[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China: 3 （in Chinese）.
    朱峰,李嘉成,曾海波,邱日强. 2018. 城市轨道交通轨地过渡电阻对杂散电流分布特性的影响[J]. 高电压技术,44(8):2738–2745.
    Zhu F,Li J C,Zeng H B,Qiu R Q. 2018. Influence of rail-to-ground resistance of urban transit systems on distribution characteristics of stray current[J]. High Voltage Engineering,44(8):2738–2745 (in Chinese).
    Lu J,Xie T,Li M,Wang Y L,Ren Y X,Gao S D,Wang L W,Zhao J L. 2016. Monitoring shallow resistivity changes prior to the 12 May 2008 MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake on the Longmen Shan tectonic zone,China[J]. Tectonophysics,675:244–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.006
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    He Zhaobo, Teng Yuntian, Hu Xingxing. 2021: Realization of high-precision measurement technology for frequency signal of optically pumped magnetometer. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 43(2): 245-254. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200091
    Zhang Ayao, Fan Guangchao, Wang Minchao, Shen Xufeng, Zhang Chengliu, Lu Na, Cui Jiajia. 2018: Amplitude characteristic analysis of noise and signal from the stations deployed at different depths. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(4): 440-447. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170150
    Ma Qinzhong. 2018: Abnormal signals of geoelectric field related to Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake recorded at the Chengdu station. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(3): 351-363. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170210
    Xu Pengshen, Teng Yuntian, Yu Ziye, Wang Xiaomei, Wu Qiong, Hu Xingxing. 2018: Electromagnetic anomaly identification algorithm based on signal fingerprinting. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(1): 79-88. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20170123
    Ma Xiaoxi, Zhang Yu, Wang Lanwei, Zhang Xingguo. 2015: Signal detection method for AC geo-resistivity observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(5): 853-864. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.05.013
    Wang Mei, Ji Aidong, Xu Changpeng, Wang Peng, Qu Tonglei, Zhang Ming. 2015: Analysis of high-frequency signal recorded by gravimeter and broadband seismometer and its application to anomaly identification. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(3): 473-481. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.03.010
    Geng Guanshi, Yu Yanxiang. 2015: Influence of magnitude and hypocentral distance on H/V spectral ratio of seismic signal. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(3): 420-428. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.03.005
    Yao Li, Chen Huaran, He Yufei. 2013: The signal to noise ratio disturbance of ionospheric VLF radio signal before the 2010 Yushu MS7.1 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(3): 390-399. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.03.010
    2004: 华东地区地电阻率各向异性度的地震前兆异常特征初步研究. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(2): 223-227.
    ZHOU CHANGXI, Xu GUOMING h. 1990: HOMOMORPHIC SINGAL PROCESSING FOR THE ALIASING SIESMIC SIGNALS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(3): 299-306.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1443) PDF downloads (160) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return