Volume 44 Issue 4
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang G M,Wu Z H,Liu C W,Zhang T Y,Peng G L. 2022. Relocation and seismogenic structure analysis of the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake sequence on January 2,2022. Acta Seismologica Sinica,44(4):581−593 doi: 10.11939/jass.20220017
Citation: Wang G M,Wu Z H,Liu C W,Zhang T Y,Peng G L. 2022. Relocation and seismogenic structure analysis of the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake sequence on January 2,2022. Acta Seismologica Sinica44(4):581−593 doi: 10.11939/jass.20220017

Relocation and seismogenic structure analysis of the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake sequence on January 2,2022

doi: 10.11939/jass.20220017
  • Received Date: 2022-01-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-03-19
  • Available Online: 2022-07-04
  • Publish Date: 2022-07-15
  • On January 2, 2022, a MS5.5 earthquake occurred in the Ninglang County, Lijiang City, Yunnan Province. Using the P and S phase arrival data of this MS5.5 earthquake provided by the Seismic Catalogue System, the high-precision relative positions of 694 earthquakes in Ninglang MS5.5 earthquake sequence are obtained by using the double difference relocation algorithm. In general, the relocations reveal a 11 km-long, linear NNE−NS seismicity trend concentrating in the 4—11 km depth range, which is consistent with the NNE nodal plane (191°) of the mainshock focal mechanism solution. The mainshock is located in the southern segment of the earthquake sequence. The earthquake sequence shows two groups of active branches with different tendencies on the depth profiles, in which the east branch is consistent with the dip angle of the nodal plane Ⅱ (81°) of the mainshock focal mechanism solution. In addition, the earthquake may have triggered local fault activity in the adjacent area. According to the comprehensive analysis, the seismogenic structure of the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake sequence should be a NNE−NS trending left-lateral strike-slip fault, with normal component, and the fault plane dips to the WNW at 81° angle. The properties of the seismogenic fault are not completely consistent with any mapped faults in this area. Although the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake sequence is located to the north of the MS5.7 Ninglang-Yanyuan earthquake sequence in 2012, they have different seismogenic structures. The result of Coulomb failure stress shows that the MS5.7 Ninglang-Yanyuan earthquake in 2012 promoted the occurrence of the MS5.5 Ninglang earthquake.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    An X W, Chang Z F. 2018. Quaternary Active Faults in Yunnan: Distribution Map of Quaternary Active Faults in Yunnan[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press: 11–19 (in Chinese).
    [2]
    Chang Z F,Yang S Y,Zhou Q Y,Zhang Y F,Xie Y Q. 2013. Discussion of seismogenic structure of the June 24,2012 Ninglang-Yanyuan MS5.7 earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology,35(1):37–49 (in Chinese).
    [3]
    Chang Z F,Mao Z B,Ma B Q,Dai B Y. 2019. The Amojiang fault zone and Mojiang M5.9 earthquake in 2018 in southern Yunnan Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,38(6):967–976 (in Chinese).
    [4]
    Deng Q D. 2007. Map of Active Tectonics in China (1 ∶ 4000000)[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press:1 (in Chinese).
    [5]
    Du F,Wu J. 2008. Character of Yanyuan M5.8 earthquake on 24 May 2001[J]. Earthquake Research in Sichuan,(3):11–19 (in Chinese).
    [6]
    Hu C Z,Yang P X,Xiong R W. 2012. Brief seismotectonic analysis of the June 24,2012 Ninglang−Yanyuan MS5.7 earthquake[J]. Earthquake,32(4):140–147 (in Chinese).
    [7]
    Huang X L,Wu Z H,Wu K G. 2021. Late Cenozoic development characteristics and dynamic mechanism of the main faults in the Midu area,northwestern Yunnan[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,27(6):913–927 (in Chinese).
    [8]
    Huang Y. 2008. Study on the application and development of the DD algorithm with cross correlation of waveform data in the earthquake location[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology,(4):29–34 (in Chinese).
    [9]
    Kan R J,Zhang S C,Yan F T,Yu L S. 1977. Present tectonic stress field and its relation to the characteristics of recent tectonic activity in southwestern China[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica,20(2):96–109 (in Chinese).
    [10]
    Lei X L,Wang Z W,Ma S L,He C R. 2021. A preliminary study on the characteristics and mechanism of the May 2021 MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence,Yunnan,China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,43(3):261–286 (in Chinese).
    [11]
    Li J,Jiang J Z,Wang G M,Fu H. 2021. Focal mechanism and focal depth determination of the two Tonghai,Yunnan,MS5.0 earthquakes in 2018[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,44(2):133–144 (in Chinese).
    [12]
    Li J,Jiang H K,Wei Y Y,Sun Z J. 2021. Preliminary study for seismogenic structure of the MS6.4 Jiashi earthquake on January 19,2020[J]. Seismology and Geology,43(2):357–376 (in Chinese).
    [13]
    Li L, Chen Q F, Niu F L,Fu H, Liu R F, Hou Y Y. 2009. Slip rate along the Lijiang-Ninglang fault zone estimated from repeating microearthquakes[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,54(2):447–455.
    [14]
    Liu X X,Shao Z G. 2020. Current fault movement characteristics in the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,63(3):1117–1126 (in Chinese).
    [15]
    Long F,Qi Y P,Yi G X,Wu W W,Wang G M,Zhao X Y,Peng G L. 2021. Relocation of the MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence on May 21,2021 in Yunnan Province and its seismogenic structure analysis[J]. Chinese J. Geophys.,64(8):2631–2646 (in Chinese).
    [16]
    Luo R J,Wu Z H,Huang X L,Huang X J,Zhou C J,Tian T T. 2015. The main active faults and the active tectonic system of Binchuan area,northwestern Yunnan[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,34(1):155–170 (in Chinese).
    [17]
    Qian X D,Su Y J,Li Q. 2012. Analysis for basic characteristic of Ninglang-Yanyuan MS5.7 earthquake and its precursory anomaly in Yunnan in 2012[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,35(4):455–463 (in Chinese).
    [18]
    Wang G M,Zhu L B,Su Y J,Wang Q D. 2015. Accurate location of the June 24,2012 Ninglang-Yanyuan MS5.7 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,37(5):733–746 (in Chinese).
    [19]
    Wang G M,Wu Z H,Peng G L,Liu Z F,Luo R J,Huang X L,Chen H P. 2021. Seismogenic fault and it’s rupture characteristics of the 21 May,2021 Yangbi MS6.4 earthquake:Analysis results from the relocation of the earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,27(4):662–678 (in Chinese).
    [20]
    Wang J Z,Wan Y G,Hou J F,Cui H W. 2018. Recent tectonic stress field determination in the central region of Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block[J]. Earthquake Research in China,34(4):632–641 (in Chinese).
    [21]
    Wu K G,Wu Z H,Xu F K,Sun Y J,Zhang S T,Liu J,Huang X L. 2016. Geological origin of Jinggu earthquake swarm in 2014 in southwest Yunnan:A response to propagation process of the Chafang-Puwen fault zone[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,35(1):140–151 (in Chinese).
    [22]
    Wu Z H,Long C X,Fan T Y,Zhou C J,Feng H,Yang Z Y,Tong Y B. 2015. The arc rotational-shear active tectonic system on the southeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau and its dynamic characteristics and mechanism[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,34(1):1–31 (in Chinese).
    [23]
    Xue D F. 1980. Yongning G-47-5° 1 ∶ 200000 Regional Geological Survey Report[R]. Dali: Regional Survey Team of Yunnan Geological Bureau (in Chinese).
    [24]
    Xiang H F,Xu X W,Guo X M,Zhang W X,Li H W,Yu G H. 2002. Sinistral thrusting along the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault since Quaternary and its geologic-tectonic significance:Shielding effect of transverse structure of intracontinental active block[J]. Seismology and Geology,24(2):188–198 (in Chinese).
    [25]
    Xu X W,Wen X Z,Zheng R C,Ma W T,Song F M,Yu G H. 2003. Pattern of latest tectonic motion and its dynamics for active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan region,China[J]. Scince in China:Series D,46(S2):210–226.
    [26]
    Yunnan Earthquake Agency. 2022. Intensity map of the MS5.5 Yunnan Ninglang earthquake[EB/OL]. [2022-01-06]. http://www.yndzj.gov.cn/yndzj/_300559/_300651/660277/index.html (in Chinese).
    [27]
    Zhang P Z,Deng Q D,Zhang G M,Ma J,Gan W J,Min W,Mao F Y,Wang Q. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in continental China[J]. Science in China:Series D,46(S1):13–24.
    [28]
    Fang L H,Wu J P,Liu J,Cheng J,Jiang C S,Han L B,Wang Y S,Chen K,Zhao X,Wu Z L. 2015. Preliminary report on the 22 November 2014 MW6.1/MS6.3 Kangding earthquake,western Sichuan,China[J]. Seismol Res Lett,86(6):1603–1613. doi: 10.1785/0220150006
    [29]
    He X H,Liang H,Zhang P Z,Wang Y. 2021. The 2019 MS4.2 and 5.2 Beiliu earthquake sequence in South China:Complex conjugate strike-slip faulting revealed by rupture directivity analysis[J]. Seismol Res Lett,92(6):3327–3338. doi: 10.1785/0220210008
    [30]
    Jiang J Z,Li J,Fu H. 2019. Seismicity analysis of the 2016 MS5.0 Yunlong earthquake,Yunnan,China and its tectonic implications[J]. Pure Appl Geophys,176(3):1225–1241. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-2067-7
    [31]
    Leonard M. 2010. Earthquake fault scaling:Self-consistent relating of rupture length,width,average displacement,and moment release[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,100(5A):1971–1988. doi: 10.1785/0120090189
    [32]
    Lin G Q. 2020. Waveform cross-correlation relocation and focal mechanisms for the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence[J]. Seismol Res Lett,91(4):2055–2061. doi: 10.1785/0220190277
    [33]
    Michelini A,Lomax A. 2004. The effect of velocity structure errors on double-difference earthquake location[J]. Geophys Res Lett,31(9):L09602.
    [34]
    Tozer B,Sandwell D T,Smith W H F,Olson C,Beale J R,Wessel P. 2019. Global bathymetry and topography at 15 arc sec:SRTM15+[J]. Earth Space Sci,6(10):1847–1864. doi: 10.1029/2019EA000658
    [35]
    USGS. 2022. Earthquake hazards program[EB/OL]. [2022-02-12]. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000jn65/moment-tensor.
    [36]
    Waldhauser F,Ellsworth W L. 2000. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm:Method and application to the northern Hayward fault,California[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,90(6):1353–1368. doi: 10.1785/0120000006
    [37]
    Wang Q D,Chu R S,Yang H,Zhu L B,Su Y J. 2018. Complex rupture of the 2014 MS6.6 Jinggu earthquake sequence in Yunnan province inferred from double-difference relocation[J]. Pure Appl Geophys,175(12):4253–4274. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1913-y
    [38]
    Wessel P,Luis J F,Uieda L,Scharroo R,Wobbe F,Smith W H F,Tian D D. 2019. The generic mapping tools version 6[J]. Geochem Geophys Geosyst,20(11):5556–5564. doi: 10.1029/2019GC008515
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (79) PDF downloads(22) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return