Su Y J,Sun N,Zhao X Y,He S G,Zhang Q. 2024. The prolonged quiescence anomaly and the future trends of strong earthquakes in Yunnan region. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(2):242−256. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230097
Citation: Su Y J,Sun N,Zhao X Y,He S G,Zhang Q. 2024. The prolonged quiescence anomaly and the future trends of strong earthquakes in Yunnan region. Acta Seismologica Sinica46(2):242−256. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230097

The prolonged quiescence anomaly and the future trends of strong earthquakes in Yunnan region

More Information
  • Received Date: August 21, 2023
  • Revised Date: December 13, 2023
  • Available Online: June 25, 2024
  • From the Lijiang MS7.0 earthquake in 1996 to August 22, 2023, a significant phenomenon of seismic quiescence has lasted for 27.55 years, which are the longest quiet period since 1900, both for M≥6.7 and M≥7.0 earthquakes in Yunnan Province. We further analyze and summarize the quiescence anomaly phenomenon of Yunnan’s strong earthquake and its relationship to the seismic status of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau and Sichuan-Yunnan block on a larger spatio-temporal scale. Meanwhile, we discuss the future seismic trends in Yunnan region. Here are the conclusions.

    1) The energy released by all M≥5.0 earthquakes per year in Yunnan region is equivalent to an M6.7 earthquake, which means an M6.7 represents the mean released energy per year, so we choose M6.7 as the lower limit of strong earthquake to study the seismicity in Yunnan region. The retrospective analysis based on historical earthquakes indicates that the characteristics of active-quiet alternation in Yunnan region, Sichuan-Yunnan block, and QinghaiXizang Plateau, which are closely related to tectonic settings of M≥6.7 or M≥7.0 earthquakes.

    Since 1887, there are four active-quiet alternative periods for M≥6.7 earthquakes in Yunnan region, the active periods are 1913−1925, 1936−1955, 1970−1979, 1988−1996 with the mean duration of (11.96±5.35) years, while the quiet periods are 1887−1913, 1925−1936, 1955−1970, 1979−1988 with the mean duration (15.07±7.57) years. As for M≥7.0 earthquakes, the active periods are 1913−1925, 1941−1950, 1970−1976, and 1988−1996 with the mean duration (8.40±2.12) years, while the quiet are 1887−1913, 1925−1941, 1950−1970, 1976−1988 with the mean duration (18.58±5.87) years. The annual rate of occurrence is 0.42−0.83 times per year for M≥6.7 earthquakes and 0.27−0.63 times per year for the M≥7.0 earthquakes in Yunnan region.

    Since 1887, there have been two active-quiet alternative periods for M≥6.7 earthquakes in the Sichuan-Yunnan block, and the active periods are 1887−1925, 1948−1996 with the mean duration (42.47±7.38) years, while the quiet periods are 1925−1948, 1996−2022 with the mean duration (24.89±2.40) years. The annual rate of occurrence is 0.16−0.25 times per year for M≥6.7 earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan block.

    Since 1897, there have been three active-quiet alternative periods for M≥7.0 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. The active periods are 1904−1956, 1970−1976, and 1988 to now, while the quiet periods are 1897−1904, 1956−1970, 1976−1988 with the mean duration (10.88±3.26) years. The annual occurrence rate is 0.88−1.36 times per year for M≥7.0 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau.

    2) Since 1887, there have been significant differences in seismicity around Yunnan region for its five quiet periods of M≥6.7 earthquakes. The quiescence periods Ⅰ , Ⅱ , and Ⅴ appeared under the background of the seismic activity of M≥7.0 earthquakes in QinghaiXizang Plateau, namely, seismic quiescence appeared in Yunnan region while activity in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. However the quiescence periods Ⅲ and Ⅳ appeared under the background of the quiescence of M≥7 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, namely both quiescence in Yunnan region and Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Currently, the period Ⅴ has lasted for 27.55 years in Yunnan region, and the surrounding seismic activity is similar to that in the quiet periods Ⅰ and Ⅱ . Therefore we deduce the following seismic trend may be in relatively weak active periods, similar to the periods Ⅰ and Ⅱ .

    3) The comparison of seismicity between the Big Triangle area and Qinghai-Xizang Plateau shows that the active period (1904−1956) of M≥7.0 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau corresponds to the active period (1879−1957) of M≥8.0 earthquakes in Big Triangle area; from 1956 to 1988 there were two quiet periods in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau which correspond to the quiet period (1954−2001) in Big Triangle area, seismicity of M≥7.0 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau has been in an active period since 1988 while the seismicity of M≥8.0 earthquakes in Big Triangle area has come into a new active period since 2001. These seem to indicate that the active periods are consistent, as well as the quiet periods of M≥7.0 earthquakes in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau and M≥8.0 earthquakes in the Big Triangle area. The analogy of the current and the period (1840−1957) of M≥8.0 earthquakes in the Big Triangle area suggests that the current active period of M≥7.0 earthquakes and M≥8.0 earthquakes in the Big Triangle area of East Asian continent will last for decades in the future.

    4) On September 5, 2022, an MS6.8 earthquake occurred in Luding, Sichuan Province. The earthquake was located on the Moxi fault, the southeast section of the Xianshuihe fault zone. The quiet period of M≥6.7 earthquakes that lasted for 26.59 years in the SichuanYunnan block since 1996 has been terminated by the Luding MS6.8 earthquake. The following seismicity may be a new active period of M≥6.7 earthquakes in the Sichuan-Yunnan block that analogizes the seismicity of quiet and active periods around 1948.

    5) Since 1997, all earthquakes with M≥7.0 in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau have concentrated in the Bayan Har block except for several occurred in the Himalayan belt and Myanmar arc region. The retrospective analysis based on historical earthquakes indicates that the main region of seismic activity is alternative in the Sichuan-Yunnan block and Bayan Har block: Seismic activity appeared in the Bayan Har block while quiescence in the Sichuan-Yunnan block, by contrast, seismic activity appeared in the Sichuan-Yunnan block while less activity in Bayan Har block. Based on the inference, seismicity will be active in the Sichuan-Yunnan block and weak in the Bayan Har block after the Luding MS6.8 earthquake in 2022.

  • 邓起东,程绍平,马冀,杜鹏. 2014. 青藏高原地震活动特征及当前地震活动形势[J]. 地球物理学报,57(7):2025–2042. doi: 10.6038/cjg20140701
    Deng Q D,Cheng S P,Ma J,Du P. 2014. Seismic activities and earthquake potential in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,57(7):2025–2042 (in Chinese).
    傅征祥,刘杰,王晓青,郝平,吕梅梅. 2003. 中国大陆西部及邻区板内8级大地震活动过程和趋势预测初步研究[J]. 地学前缘,10(特刊):112–117.
    Fu Z X,Liu J,Wang X Q,Hao P,Lü M M. 2003. Research on process and tendency prediction of great earthquakes (MS≥8) in western China continent and its surroundings[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,10(Z1):112–117 (in Chinese).
    傅征祥,吕晓健,郝平,邵志刚,陈丹. 2012. 东亚大陆大三角地震区地震活动性概要[M]. 北京:地震出版社:22−27.
    Fu Z X,Lü X J,Hao P,Shao Z G,Chen D. 2012. Summary of Seismic Activity in the Great Seismic Triangle Area of Eastern Asian Continent[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:22−27 (in Chinese).
    国家地震局震害防御司. 1995. 中国历史强震目录(公元前23世纪—公元1911年)[M]. 北京:地震出版社:1–514.
    Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention,State Seismological Bureau. 1995. Catalogue of Strong Earthquakes in China (23rd Century BCAD 1911)[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:1–514 (in Chinese).
    国家地震局震害防御司. 1999. 中国近代地震目录(公元1912—1990,MS≥4.7)[M]. 北京:地震出版社:1–617.
    Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention,State Seismological Bureau. 1999. Catalogue of Strong Earthquakes in China (AD 1912−1990,MS≥4.7)[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:1−617 (in Chinese).
    皇甫岗,秦嘉政. 2006. 云南地区大震活动规律研究[J]. 地震地质,28(1):37–47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2006.01.004
    Huangfu G,Qin J Z. 2006. Study of the seismicity of strong earthquakes in Yunnan area[J]. Seismology and Geology,28(1):37–47 (in Chinese).
    皇甫岗,石绍先,苏有锦. 2000. 20世纪云南地震活动研究[J]. 地震研究,23(1):1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2000.01.001
    Huangfu G,Shi S X,Su Y J. 2000. Study on seismicity in Yunnan in the 20th century[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,23(1):1–9 (in Chinese).
    皇甫岗,苏有锦,张建国,邵德盛. 2013. 新世纪滇缅交界大震活动研究[M]. 昆明:云南科技出版社:131−149.
    Huangfu G,Su Y J,Zhang J G,Shao D S. 2013. Research on Large Earthquake Activities in Yunnan and Myanmar Border in the New Century[M]. Kunming:Yunnan Science and Technology Press:131−149 (in Chinese).
    皇甫岗,苏有锦,张建国. 2014. 缅甸孟帕亚7.2级地震及其对云南强震活动趋势的意义[J]. 地震地质,36(3):598–608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.03.005
    Huangfu G,Su Y J,Zhang J G. 2014. The Mong Hpayak M7.2 earthquake and the significance for the tendency of large earthquake in Yunnan[J]. Seismology and Geology,36(3):598–608 (in Chinese).
    刘祖荫,苏有锦,秦嘉政,李中华,张俊伟. 2002. 20世纪云南地震活动[M]. 北京:地震出版社:10−19.
    Liu Z Y,Su Y J,Qin J Z,Li Z H,Zhang J W. 2002. Seismic Activity in Yunnan Region in the 20th Century[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:10−19 (in Chinese).
    秦嘉政,钱晓东,刘丽芳. 2009. 云南强震活动间隔时间特征研究[J]. 地震研究, 32 (3):221−227.
    Qin J Z,Qian X D,Liu L F. 2009. Study on interval time characteristics of strong earthquake activities in Yunnan region[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 32 (3):221−227 (in Chinese).
    宋治平,张国民,刘杰,尹继尧,薛艳,宋先月. 2011. 全球地震灾害信息目录(9999 BC—AD 2010)[M]. 北京:地震出版社:17−448.
    Song Z P,Zhang G M,Liu J,Yin J Y,Xue Y,Song X Y. 2011. Disaster Information Catalog of Global Earthquakes (9999 BC−AD 2010)[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:17−448 (in Chinese).
    苏有锦,秦嘉政. 2001. 川滇地区强地震活动与区域新构造运动的关系[J]. 中国地震,17(1):24–34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2001.01.004
    Su Y J,Qin J Z. 2001. Strong earthquake activity and relation to regional neotectonic movement in Sichuan-Yunnan region[J]. Earthquake Research in China,17(1):24–34 (in Chinese).
    苏有锦,李忠华,刘祖荫,蔡民军. 2001. 20世纪云南地区MS≥5.0级地震活动的基本特征[J]. 地震研究,24(1):1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2001.01.001
    Su Y J,Li Z H,Liu Z Y,Cai M J. 2001. Basic characteristics of seismicity with MS≥5.0 in Yunnan in the 20th century[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,24(1):1–9 (in Chinese).
    苏有锦,李忠华. 2011. 云南地区6级以上强震时间分布特征及其概率预测模型研究[J]. 地震研究,34(1):1–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2011.01.001
    Su Y J,Li Z H. 2011. Interval distribution and probability model of the strong earthquakes with MS≥6.0 in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,34(1):1–7 (in Chinese).
    吴中海,赵根模,龙长兴,周春景,范桃园. 2014. 青藏高原东南缘现今大震活动特征及其趋势:活动构造体系角度的初步分析结果[J]. 地质学报, 88 (8):1401−1416.
    Wu Z H,Zhao G M,Long C X,Zhou C J,Fan T Y. 2014. The seismic hazard assessment around south-east area of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau:A preliminary results from active tectonics system analysis[J]. Acta Geologica Sinca, 88 (8):1401−1416 (in Chinese).
    张国民,马宏生,王辉,王新岭. 2005. 中国大陆活动地块边界带与强震活动[J]. 地球物理学报,48(3):602–610. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.03.018
    Zhang G M,Ma H S,Wang H,Wang X L. 2005. Boundaries between active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the China mainland[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,48(3):602–610 (in Chinese). doi: 10.1002/cjg2.693
    张培震,邓起东,张国民,马瑾,甘卫军,闵伟,毛凤英,王琪. 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑),33(S1):12–20.
    Zhang P Z,Deng Q D,Zhang G M,Ma J,Gan W J,Min W,Mao F Y,Wang Q. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China[J]. Science in China:Series D,46(S2):13–24. doi: 10.1360/03dz0002
    赵小艳,付虹,王强. 2008. 汶川8.0级地震后云南地震趋势研究[J]. 地震研究, 31 (增刊):453−457.
    Zhao X Y,Fu H,Wang Q. 2008. Earthquake tendency in Yunnan after the Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 31 (S):453−457 (in Chinese).
    An Y R,Wang,D,Ma Q,Xu Y R,Li Y,Zhang Y Y,Liu Z M,Huang C M,Su J R,Li J L,Li M X,Chen W K,Wan Z F,Kang D J,Wang B S. 2023. Preliminary report of the September 5,2022 MS6.8 Luding earthquake,Sichuan,China[J]. Earthq Res Adv,3(1):100184. doi: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100184
    Bilham R,Gaur V K,Molnar P. 2001. Himalayan seismic hazard[J]. Science,293(5534):1442–1444. doi: 10.1126/science.1062584
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 闫坤,王伟君,冯磊,彭菲,寇华东,袁爱璟,付广裕. 2012年以来新疆于田强震前震序列的时空演化模式. 地球物理学报. 2023(01): 245-259 .
    2. Kong Xiangyan,Chen Xiangjun. Double Difference Location of the Mainshock and Aftershocks of the Hutubi M_S6.2 Earthquake That Occurred on December 8, 2016. Earthquake Research in China. 2018(02): 227-232 .
    3. 孙昭杰,李金,黄瑜,桂荣. 2015年新疆皮山6.5级地震序列震源机制特征分析. 中国地震. 2018(01): 71-82 .
    4. 杨文,程佳,姚琪,崔仁胜,龙海云,韩颜颜. 2016年新疆呼图壁6.2级地震发震构造. 地震地质. 2018(05): 1100-1114 .
    5. 李锋,李迎春,李强,冯志生,王俊菲. 2016年10月20日射阳M_S4.4地震的震源机制与地震序列的时空分布特征. 地震学报. 2017(05): 659-668+818 . 本站查看
    6. 孔祥艳,陈向军,刘建明,钟世军. 2016年12月8日呼图壁M_S6.2地震余震序列精定位研究. 内陆地震. 2017(03): 237-241 .
    7. 孔祥艳,陈向军,钟世军,刘建明. 2016年11月25日阿克陶M_S6.7地震及其余震序列精定位. 内陆地震. 2017(02): 110-114 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (229) PDF downloads (57) Cited by(9)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return