Chu J,Chen H J,Li X J,Gao M Z,He Q M,Zhou L Y. 2025. Shaking table test on utility tunnel under longitudinal near-fault velocity pulse ground motion. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(3):438−454. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240003
Citation: Chu J,Chen H J,Li X J,Gao M Z,He Q M,Zhou L Y. 2025. Shaking table test on utility tunnel under longitudinal near-fault velocity pulse ground motion. Acta Seismologica Sinica47(3):438−454. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20240003

Shaking table test on utility tunnel under longitudinal near-fault velocity pulse ground motion

More Information
  • Received Date: January 07, 2024
  • Revised Date: May 26, 2024
  • With the accelerated development of urban underground infrastructure, utility tunnels have become a critical component of lifeline systems. Ensuring their seismic resilience is essential, particularly in near-fault zones where ground motions often exhibit distinct velocity pulse characteristics. These pulses, characterized by short durations and high amplitudes, can drastically alter the seismic response of buried structures. However, systematic experimental research on how these velocity pulses affect the seismic behavior of shallow-buried, highstiffness utility tunnels is still scarce. This study addresses this gap by conducting a series of shaking table tests with longitudinal input motions to investigate the dynamic responses of a utility tunnel-soil system under velocity pulse-type and non-pulse-type ground motions.

    The experiments were carried out on a shaking table array consisting of nine sub-tables. A 1/30 scaled model of the utility tunnel, made of organic glass due to its favorable mechanical similarity to the prototype, was carefully embedded within model clay soil. Actual near-fault ground motion records with velocity pulses and synthetic non-pulse ground motions whose response spectra are matched to relevant standards were employed as inputs. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) was scaled to three levels: 0.10g, 0.20g, and 0.30g. Accelerometers and laser displacement sensors were installed at various depths and structural levels to capture dynamic responses including acceleration, displacement, and frequency content.

    The main findings are summarized as follows: ① Velocity pulse motions significantly amplified the seismic responses of the soil, particularly near the surface. These included greater peak accelerations and displacements compared to non-pulse velocity inputs. As the input intensity increased, the predominant frequency of the soil decreased, indicating stiffness degradation and energy redistribution caused by pulse effects. ② The structural response of the utility tunnel was also strongly affected by pulse characteristics. Acceleration amplification factors increased markedly at the upper levels of the structure under pulse-type ground motions, revealing enhanced vertical energy transmission. ③ The soil and structure exhibited synchronized dynamic behavior, particularly in terms of predominant frequency and spectral shape. However, the upper structural levels, due to reduced confinement, displayed more pronounced responses, indicating the emergence of free-vibration characteristics and reduced soil-structure constraint.

    This study systematically examines the amplification mechanism induced by near-fault velocity pulse ground motions on utility tunnels. It reveals the interplay between input motion characteristics, structural geometry, and soil-structure interaction under strong ground motion scenarios. The results provide valuable experimental evidence.

  • 宝鑫,刘晶波,李述涛,王菲. 2021. 土-结构相互作用对储液结构动力反应的影响研究[J]. 工程力学,38(增刊):125–132.
    Bao X,Liu J B,Li S T,Wang F. 2021. Influence analysis of soil-structure interaction on the dynamic response of storage tanks[J]. Engineering Mechanics,38(S1):125–132 (in Chinese).
    陈红娟,闫维明,陈适才,张学明. 2015. 小比例尺地下结构振动台试验模型土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,35(3):59–66.
    Chen H J,Yan W M,Chen S C,Zhang X M. 2015. Design and experimental research on model soil used for shaking table test of a small scale underground structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,35(3):59–66 (in Chinese).
    陈红娟,李小军,闫维明,陈适才,张学明. 2017. 锯末混合土场地模型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,39(11):2068–2077.
    Chen H J,Li X J,Yan W M,Chen S C,Zhang X M. 2017. Shaking table tests on sawdust-mixed clay site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,39(11):2068–2077 (in Chinese).
    韩俊艳,郭之科,李满君,李立云,侯本伟,杜修力. 2021. 纵向非一致激励下非均匀场地中埋地管道的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,43(6):1147–1156.
    Han J Y,Guo Z K,Li M J,Li L Y,Hou B W,Du X L. 2021. Shaking table tests on buried pipelines in inhomogeneous soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,43(6):1147–1156 (in Chinese).
    贺秋梅. 2012. 地震动的速度脉冲对结构反应及结构减隔震性能影响研究[D]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所:1−126.
    He Q M. 2012. Study on the Influence of Seismic Velocity Pulse on Structural Response and Isolation Properties[D]. Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration:1−126 (in Chinese).
    贾俊峰,杜修力,韩强. 2015. 近断层地震动特征及其对工程结构影响的研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报,36(1):1–12.
    Jia J F,Du X L,Han Q. 2015. A state-of-the-art review of near-fault earthquake ground motion characteristics and effects on engineering structures[J]. Journal of Building Structures,36(1):1–12 (in Chinese).
    钱七虎. 2017. 建设城市地下综合管廊,转变城市发展方式[J]. 隧道建设,37(6):647–654.
    Qian Q H. 2017. To transform way of urban development by constructing underground utility tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction,37(6):647–654 (in Chinese).
    曲哲,师骁. 2016. 汶川地震和鲁甸地震的脉冲型地震动比较研究[J]. 工程力学,33(8):150–157.
    Qu Z,Shi X. 2016. Comparative study on the pulse-like ground motions in the Wenchuan and the Ludian earthquakes[J]. Engineering Mechanics,33(8):150–157 (in Chinese).
    汤爱平,李志强,冯瑞成,周锡元. 2009. 共同沟结构体系振动台模型试验与分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,41(6):1–5.
    Tang A P,Li Z Q,Feng R C,Zhou X Y. 2009. Model experiment and analysis on seismic response of utility tunnel systems using a shaking table[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,41(6):1–5 (in Chinese).
    王国波,马险峰,杨林德. 2009. 软土地铁车站结构及隧道的三维地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学,30(8):2523–2528.
    Wang G B,Ma X F,Yang L D. 2009. Three-dimensional seismic response analysis of metro station structures and tunnels in soft soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,30(8):2523–2528 (in Chinese).
    王国波,徐海清,于艳丽. 2013. “群洞效应”对紧邻交叠盾构隧道及场地土地震响应影响的初步分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,35(5):968–973.
    Wang G B,Xu H Q,Yu Y L. 2013. Effect of group cavities on seismic response of adjacent overlapping shield tunnels and site soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,35(5):968–973 (in Chinese).
    王国波,王亚西,于艳丽,陈斌. 2015. 土体-隧道群相互作用体系地震响应研究[J]. 中国公路学报,28(7):66–76.
    Wang G B,Wang Y X,Yu Y L,Chen B. 2015. Study on seismic responses of soil-tunnel group interaction system[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,28(7):66–76 (in Chinese).
    王永志,Wilson D W,Khosravi M,袁晓铭,Olgum C G. 2016. 动力离心模型试验循环剪应力-剪应变反演方法对比[J]. 岩土工程学报,38(2):271–277.
    Wang Y Z,Wilson D W,Khosravi M,Yuan X M,Olgum C G. 2016. Evaluation of cyclic shear stress-strain using inverse analysis techniques in dynamic centrifuge tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,38(2):271–277 (in Chinese).
    谢俊举,李小军,温增平. 2017. 近断层速度大脉冲对反应谱的放大作用[J]. 工程力学,34(8):194–211.
    Xie J J,LI X J,Wen Z P. 2017. The amplification effects of near-fault distinct velocity pulses on response spectra[J]. Engineering Mechanics,34(8):194–211 (in Chinese).
    Bakir B S,Sucuoğlu H,Yilmaz T. 2002. An overview of local site effects and the associated building damage in Adapazari during the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,92(1):509–526. doi: 10.1785/0120000819
    Bolt B A. 1971. The San Fernando valley,California,earthquake of February 9 1971:Data on seismic hazards[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,61(2):501–510. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0610020501
    Chen H J,Li X J,Yan W M,Chen S C,Zhang X M. 2017. Shaking table test of immersed tunnel considering the geological condition[J]. Eng Geol,227:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.014
    Chen H J,Chen S,Chen S C,Zhang X M,Wang L H. 2021. Dynamic behavior of sawdust-mixed soil in shaking table test[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,142:106542. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106542
    Chen H J,El Naggar M H,Chu J,Li X J,He Q M,Wang L H,Liu X W,Zhou L Y. 2023. Transverse response of utility tunnel under near fault ground motions:Multi-shake table array tests[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,174:108135. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108135
    Chen J,Shi X J,Li J. 2010. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,30(11):1400–1416. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.014
    Chen J,Jiang L Z,Li J,Shi X J. 2012. Numerical simulation of shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake excitation[J]. Tunn Underg Space Technol,30:205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.023
    Chen X,Liu Y H,Zhou B P,Yang D X. 2020a. Seismic response analysis of intake tower structure under near-fault ground motions with forward-directivity and fling-step effects[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,132:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106098
    Chen Z Y,Liang S B,He C. 2020b. Effects of different coherency models on utility tunnel through shaking table test[J]. J Earthq Eng,24(4):579–600. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1452807
    Güneş N. 2022. Effects of near-fault pulse-like ground motions on seismically isolated buildings[J]. J Build Eng,52:104508. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104508
    Hall J F,Heaton T H,Halling M W,Wald D J. 1995. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings[J]. Earthq Spectra,11(4):569–605. doi: 10.1193/1.1585828
    Han J Y,El Naggar M H,Hou B W,Du X L,Shuai Y,Li L Y. 2020. Nonlinear soil response under non-uniform seismic excitation from multi-point shaking table tests[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,139:106342. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106342
    Housner G W,Trifunac M D. 1967. Analysis of accelerograms:Parkfield earthquake[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,57(6):1193–1220. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0570061193
    Huang D L,Zong Z L,Tang A P,Huang Z Y,Liu Q. 2022. Dynamic response and vibration isolation of pipes inside a utility tunnel passing through nonhomogeneous soil under seismic action[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,163:107522. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107522
    Iwasaki T,Penzien J,Clough R W. 1972. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Existing Bridge Design Methodology in Providing Adequate Structural Resistance to Seismic Disturbances: Phase I. Literature Survey[R]. Berkeley:University of California:282−307.
    Liang J W,Zhang J Q,Dong B W,Xu A Q,Ba Z N. 2023. Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of prefabricated T-shaped cross utility tunnel[J]. Structures,58:105516. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105516
    Malhotra P K. 1999. Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions[J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn,28(11):1309–1326. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1309::AID-EQE868>3.0.CO;2-U
    Wang G B,Ba F,Miao Y,Zhao J L. 2022. Design of multi-array shaking table tests under uniform and non-uniform earthquake excitations[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,153:107114. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107114
    Wang W L,Wang T T,Su J J,Lin C H,Seng C R,Huang T H. 2001. Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake[J]. Tunn Underg Space Technol,16(3):133–150. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5
    Yue F,Liu B W,Zhu B,Jiang X L,Chen S Y,Jaisee S,Chen L,Lü B C. 2020. Shaking table investigations on seismic performance of prefabricated corrugated steel utility tunnels[J]. Tunn Underg Space Technol,105:103579. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103579
    Zhang W G,Han L,Feng L,Ding X M,Wang L,Chen Z X,Liu H L,Aljarmouzi A,Sun W X. 2020. Study on seismic behaviors of a double box utility tunnel with joint connections using shaking table model tests[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,136:106118. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106118
    Zou D G,Han H C,Liu J M,Yang D X,Kong X J. 2017. Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfill dam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,98:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.031
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (39) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return