Chen Feng, Ma Maining, An Jinzhen. 2013: Relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(1): 84-93. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.009
Citation: Chen Feng, Ma Maining, An Jinzhen. 2013: Relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(1): 84-93. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.01.009

Relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress

More Information
  • Received Date: January 17, 2012
  • Revised Date: June 17, 2012
  • Published Date: December 31, 2012
  • Study on the relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress plays an important role in rock resistivity experiments and seismology. Using symmetrical four-electrode method, multi-position, multi-space and multi-direction resistivity arrays were arranged on 10 samples of granite, tuffaceous gritrock (with inclusion of gravel) and aplite granite, which have surface sizes of 4 cm×8 cm, 6 cm×12 cm, 8 cm×16 cm, 4.6 cm×10 cm, respectively, and 1 synthetic model of 100 cm×100 cm. The experiments were carried out with uniaxial, planar elastic constraint, low confining pressure and true triaxial compressions. In the uniaxial and low confining pressure tests, 4 of the 7 rock samples were loaded to rupture with macro-fractures, the other 3 were only loaded to the abnormal stage when resistivity began to decrease obviously. 3 of the 10 rock samples are samples of original resistivity anisotropy. According to the loading process from beginning to end, the resistivity data obtained from all of the 11 samples in the multi-position, multi-space and multi-direction resistivity arrays were divided into 4 rupture stress sections, namely, about 30%, about 50% and about 80% rupture stress sections and 100% rupture stress section. Thereby, the relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress corresponding to the 4 rupture stress sections is studied. However, the results show no confirmative relation between the two.
  • 安金珍, 修济刚, 陈峰, 陈大元. 1996. 单轴压力下有补给水岩石电阻率变化各向异性研究[J]. 中国地震, 12(3): 300-306.
    陈大元, 陈峰, 王丽华. 1983. 单轴压力下岩石电阻率的研究: 电阻率的各向异性[J]. 地球物理学报, 26(增刊): 784-792.
    陈大元, 陈峰, 贺国玉. 1987. 岩石受压过程中"应力反复"对电阻率的影响[J]. 地震学报, 9(3): 303-311.
    陈峰, 陈大元, 曹其平, 于淑筠, 许东俊, 陈从新, 余毓良, 盛建豪. 1993. 原位岩体在剪切和摩擦滑动试验中的视电阻率变化特征研究[J]. 地震学报, 15(2): 217-223.
    陈峰, 修济刚, 安金珍, 廖椿庭, 陈大元. 2000. 岩石电阻率变化各向异性与微裂隙扩展方位实验研究[J]. 地震学报, 22(3): 310-318.
    陈峰, 廖椿庭, 安金珍. 2002. 弹性约束承载岩石电阻率变化形态研究[J]. 北京大学学报自然科学版, 38(3): 427-430.
    陈峰, 安金珍, 廖椿庭. 2003a. 原始电阻率各向异性岩石的电阻率变化各向异性[J]. 地球物理学报, 46(2): 271-280.
    陈峰, 廖椿庭, 安金珍. 2003b. 剪切和摩擦滑动大模型的视电阻率变化幅度和各向异性[J]. 地球物理学报, 46(5): 667-675.
    陈有发, 陆阳泉. 1981. 地电阻率年变化的方向性与中国大陆构造应力场[J]. 地震学报, 3(1): 32-40.
    陈有发. 1993. 受压岩石电阻率的方向性及其在地震预报中的应用[J]. 华南地震, 13(3): 1-8.
    杜学彬, 马占虎, 叶青, 谭大诚, 陈军营. 2006. 与强地震有关的视电阻率各向异性变化[J]. 地球物理学进展, 21(1): 93-100.
    杜学彬, 李宁, 叶青, 马占虎, 闰睿. 2007. 强地震附近视电阻率各向异性变化的原因[J]. 地球物理学报, 50(6): 1802-1810.
    杜学彬. 2010. 在地震预报中的两类视电阻率变化[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 40(10): 1321-1330.
    金耀, 张天中, 华正兴, 徐明发, 黄平章. 1983. 单轴压缩下多裂隙含水岩样电阻率变化与体积应变[J]. 地震学报, 5(1): 99-105.
    兰州地震研究所. 1982. 国外对地电阻率法预报地震的研究[M]. 兰州: 兰州地震研究所: 1-250.
    陆阳泉, 温新民. 1980. 三向压缩下大型混凝土标本的电性特征[J]. 西北地震学报, 2(4): 55-60.
    陆阳泉, 钱家栋, 刘建毅. 1988. 砂岩在摩擦滑动中的电阻率变化及其在地震预报中的应用[J]. 西北地震学报, 10(3): 53-56.
    陆阳泉, 钱家栋, 刘建毅. 1990a. 大型花岗岩标本缓慢膨胀破裂过程中电阻率和声发射前兆特征的实验研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 12(2): 35-41.
    陆阳泉, 王玉祥, 温新民. 1990b. 受压岩(土)体电阻率变化的原地实验及大地震前后地电异常的初步分析[G]//第二届构造物理学术讨论会文集. 北京: 地震出版社: 158-168.
    吕广廷, 赵广堃, 谢原定, 金铭, 蒋续媛. 1984. 应力作用下层状砂岩电阻率的变化特征[J]. 西北地震学报, 6(1): 11-16.
    张金铸, 陆阳泉. 1983. 不同三轴应力条件下岩石电阻率变化的试验研究[J]. 地震学报, 5(4): 440-445.
    张天中, 华正兴, 徐明发. 1985. 1.2千巴围压下岩样破裂和摩擦滑动过程中电阻率变化[J]. 地震学报, 7(4): 428-433.
    张同俊. 1981. 矿井岩层受力状态与视电阻率关系的实验研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 3(1): 1-24.
    赵玉林, 钱复业, 扬体成. 1983. 原地电阻率变化的实验[J]. 地震学报, 5(2): 217-225.
    Stopin'ski W. 1992. 用电阻率测量法检测在加载条件下介质的动力过程[J]. 地震学报, 14(2): 220-228.
    Brace W F, Orange A S, Madden T R. 1965. The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water-saturated crystalline rocks[J]. J Geophys Res, 70(22): 5669-5678.
    Brace W F, Orange A S. 1966. Electrical resistivity changes in saturated rocks due to stress[J]. Science, 153(3743): 1525-1526.
    Brace W F, Orange A S. 1968a. Electrical resistivity changes in saturated rocks during fracture and frictional sliding[J]. J Geophys Res, 73(4): 1433-1445.
    Brace W F, Orange A S. 1968b. Further studies of the effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of rocks[J]. J Geophys Res, 73(16): 5407-5420.
    Brace W F. 1975. Dilatancy-related electrical resistivity changes in rocks[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 113(1-2): 207-217.
    Kurite K. 1986. How can we identify location of a fracture plane? Anisotropy of electrical conductivity and seismic velocity in dilatancy[J]. Earthq Pred Res, 4(1-2): 39-45.
    Teisseyre K. 1989. Anisotropy of electric resistivity related to crack processes before fracturing[J]. Acta Geophys Pol, 37(2): 185-192.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 李树鹏,胡敏章,祝意青,朱成林,崔华伟,陆汉鹏,张刚,王锋吉. 不同类型地震震级与重力变化异常的统计特征及其机理分析. 地球物理学报. 2024(08): 3032-3059 .
    2. 许英才,曾宪伟. 2021年11月18日宁夏灵武M_S4.0地震震源参数研究. 地球与行星物理论评. 2022(02): 214-227 .
    3. 李文君,曾宪伟,卫定军,李国斌,罗国富. 2017年9月2日宁夏固原4.6级地震震例分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2020(01): 40-47 .
    4. 詹慧丽,张冬丽,何骁慧,沈旭章,郑文俊,李志刚. 基于地震活动特征的鄂尔多斯西缘现今构造变形模式的限定. 地震地质. 2020(02): 346-365 .
    5. 曾宪伟,莘海亮,任雪梅,罗恒之. 利用sPn震相计算石嘴山M_L4.4地震震源深度. 中国地震. 2017(02): 280-289 .
    6. 陈浩,陈晓非. 2014年10月7日云南景谷M_W 6.2地震震源机制解反演和重定位. 地球物理学进展. 2016(04): 1413-1418 .
    7. 郝美仙,尹战军,丁风和,刘颖. 2015年阿拉善左旗5.8级地震震源机制解分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2016(04): 1-5 .
    8. 吕俊强,温瑞智,曾宪伟. 宁夏永宁M4.6级地震强震记录分析. 防灾减灾学报. 2015(02): 19-23 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (572) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return