Advanced Search
Rong Mianshui, Wang Shiyuan, Li Xiaojun, Lü Yuejun, Sheng Qiang, Huang Yahong, Fang Yi. 2013: Calculation and analysis of seismic ground motion parameters for different engineering geological divisions of Chengdu basin. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(4): 543-552. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.045.009
Citation: Rong Mianshui, Wang Shiyuan, Li Xiaojun, Lü Yuejun, Sheng Qiang, Huang Yahong, Fang Yi. 2013: Calculation and analysis of seismic ground motion parameters for different engineering geological divisions of Chengdu basin. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(4): 543-552. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.045.009
shu

Calculation and analysis of seismic ground motion parameters for different engineering geological divisions of Chengdu basin

  • 1.

    Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China

  • 2.

    Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China

  • 3.

    Earthquake Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China

  • 4.

    Earthquake Administration of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510070, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 08, 2012
  • Revised Date: December 04, 2012
  • Published Date: June 30, 2013
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Site condition can affect amplitude and spectrum characteristics of seismic ground motion. Adjustment scheme for ground motion characteristic period of response spectrum in Current Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China was given but peak ground motion and platform value of response spectrum were not taken into account. Illustrated by the example of Chengdu basin, engineering borehole data in the basin region were extensively collected. In consideration of the large difference between different engineering geological divisions, the equal linear method was used to conduct seismic response analysis of soil layers for different boreholes based on engineering geological division. As a result, suggested earthquake ground motion adjustment factors for different engineering geological divisions were given.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (10)
  • 国家质量技术监督局. 2001. 中国地震动参数区划图(GB18306-2001)[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
    蒋溥, 王启鸣, 钱瑞华. 1990. 地震小区划概论[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 12-96.
    李小军, 彭青. 2001. 不同类别场地地震动参数的计算分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 21(1): 29-36.
    李小军, 彭青, 刘文忠. 2001. 设计地震动参数确定中的场地影响考虑[J]. 世界地震工程, 17(4): 34-41.
    钱洪, 唐荣昌. 1997. 成都平原的形成与演化[J]. 四川地震, (3): 1-7.
    荣棉水. 2007. 粘弹性场地地形对地震动谱特性的影响分析[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所: 59-64.
    施春花. 2009. 北京地区场地条件对地震动参数的影响[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地壳应力研究所: 55-76.
    周锡元, 王广军, 苏经宇. 1991. 场地.地基.设计地震[M]. 北京: 地震出版社: 55-95.
    中国地震局. 1994. 中华人民共和国地震行业标准: 工程场地地震安全性评价工作范围(DB001-94)[S]. 北京: 地震出版社.
    Романова Е И. 1990. 王邵全. 1991. 用于地震小区划的工程地质分区图[J]. 地质科技动态, 15(1): 55-58.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 罗恒之，曾宪伟，李文君，罗国富. 宁夏地区地震视应力时空变化特征分析. 地震工程学报. 2025(01): 178-188+198 .
    2. 臧阳，孟令媛，周龙泉. 2016年新西兰M_S8.0地震震源及强地面运动特征分析. 地震学报. 2017(01): 1-12+155 . 本站查看
    3. 王俊，郑定昌，郑江蓉，詹小艳，江昊琳，李正楷，张金川. 利用背景噪声自相关研究芦山M7.0地震震源区地壳相对波速的时空变化特征. 地震地质. 2016(01): 152-168 .
    4. 白玉柱，徐锡伟，李铁明，周本刚. 芦山地震强地面运动频谱特征及致灾相关性分析. 地震工程学报. 2016(04): 570-580 .
    5. Meng Lingyuan，Zhou Longquan，Shi Haixia. A Study on the Characteristics of the Yutian, Xinjiang M_S7.3 Earthquake, February 12, 2014. Earthquake Research in China. 2015(01): 47-56 .
    6. 孟令媛，周龙泉，刘杰. 2013年巴基斯坦M_W7.7地震震源参数特征及烈度分布估计. 地震. 2014(04): 12-19 .
    7. 赵烽帆，史海霞，周志华. 2008年汶川M_S8.0地震和2013年芦山M_S7.0地震震源特征比较分析. 中国地震. 2014(04): 604-610 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (617) PDF downloads (28) Cited by(8)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return