ZHU CHUAN-ZHEN, FU CHANG-HONG, LUO SHENG-LIcom sh adv. 1981: STUDY OF EARTHQUAKE SWARMS IN RELATION TO LARGE EARTHQUAKES (NORTH CHINA AREA). Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(2): 105-117.
Citation: ZHU CHUAN-ZHEN, FU CHANG-HONG, LUO SHENG-LIcom sh adv. 1981: STUDY OF EARTHQUAKE SWARMS IN RELATION TO LARGE EARTHQUAKES (NORTH CHINA AREA). Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(2): 105-117.

STUDY OF EARTHQUAKE SWARMS IN RELATION TO LARGE EARTHQUAKES (NORTH CHINA AREA)

More Information
  • Published Date: August 31, 2011
  • From 1956 to 1976, there occurred thirty-seven earthquake swarms in North China, (i.e. east of 106 E, north of 33N, south of 42 N and west of Yellow sea). Among these, the number of earthquake swarms occurred just after the 1966 Xingtai (邢台) Earthquake to the 1976 Tangshan (唐山) Earthquake is about three times more than the number of swarms occurred in the period of 1956-1966. During the last ten years, all of the large earthquakes (M>7.0) occurred on the background of a continuously increasing activities of earthquake swarms.In view of the spatial distribution, the scope of activity of earthquake swarms) is limited in smaller areas, close to the epicenters of future large earthquakes. However, since 1974, the swarm activity has been clearly enlarged in spatial distribution. Around the epicenter of the subsequent Tangshan Earthquake, both in the NE-SW and NW-SE directions it was lengthened by more than 1000 kms, in less than half a year before the earthquake.Such a phenomenon of seismic activity spreading out from the epicenter of the impending major earthquake with the lapse of time can also be noticed before several historical earthquakes, the average spreading rate may be roughly estimated as about 100 km/year.Besides, it is also observed that precursory earthquake swarms, appear several months to one or two years before the impending large earthquakes at a not too far distance (about 100 kms).The possible differences between the precursory earthquake swarms and the ordinary ones in focal mechanism, dynamic source parameters, b value as well as the amplitude ratios of P and S waves have-been analysed. Preliminary results show that the stress drops for precursory earthquake swarms are higher. Finally, the physical and tectonic conditions under which precursory swarms might be observed are briefly discussed.
  • [1] 関谷溥,群凳性地震と地震予知,地震予知研究ッンポジワム,1972

    [2] 茂木清夫,地震活动と地震予知,地震予知ッンポジワム,1977

    [3] M .Isliida, and H. Kanamori., The foresliock activity of the 1971 san fernaudo earthquake California, BSSA,68, 5,1265——1280,1978

    [4] F. F. Evison, Precursory seismi;e sequences in mew Zealand,NZ Jour of Geology and Geo——physics,20,11129——141,1977.

    [5] F. F. Evison, The precursory earthquake swarm, Phaysics of the earth and Planatary Interiors,15,19——23,1977

    [6] 华北地区ML地震目录(1952——1974)地震出版社(待发表).

    [7] 北京及邻区地震目录汇编,地震出版社(待发表).

    [8] 张祖胜,唐山7.8级地震的地面形变,欧洲地震委员会地球物理年会报告,1978,斯特拉斯堡.

    [9] 赛克斯,缓慢地震与应力重新分布,国外地震,3, 10——13, 1979

    [10] 许忠淮等,京津唐张地区地震应力场的方向特征,地震学报,1, 2, 121——132, 1979

    [11] 约翰逊,粘滑源参数和地震源参数,国外地震,4, 41——43, 1975

    [12] T .Mikumo, Source process of deep and Intermediate eartliauakes as inferred from long——period P and S waveforms, Physics of the Earth, 19. 4. 303——320. 1971,

    [13] 朱传镇等,海城地震前后微震震源参数和介质品质因子,地球物理学报,20, 3, 228——231, 1977.

    [14] R. Green, A. McGarr, A comparison of the focal mechanism and aftersliock distribution of the Ceres South Africa earthquake of September 29, 1969, BSS9, 62, 3, 869——871, 1972

    [15] 张之立等,唐山地震的破裂过程及其力学分析,地震学报,2,2,111——129.1980

    [16] 邢台地震总结,地震出版社(待发表).

    [17] 顾浩鼎等,1975, 2, 4.辽宁省海城地震的震源机制,地球物理学报,19, 4, 270——284, 1976.

    [18] 吴开统等,海城地震序列的特征,地球物理学报,19, 2, 95——109, 1976.

    [19] D. F'. Hill, A model of earthquake swarm J. G.R.82. 8. 1347——1352. 1977.

    [1] 関谷溥,群凳性地震と地震予知,地震予知研究ッンポジワム,1972

    [2] 茂木清夫,地震活动と地震予知,地震予知ッンポジワム,1977

    [3] M .Isliida, and H. Kanamori., The foresliock activity of the 1971 san fernaudo earthquake California, BSSA,68, 5,1265——1280,1978

    [4] F. F. Evison, Precursory seismi;e sequences in mew Zealand,NZ Jour of Geology and Geo——physics,20,11129——141,1977.

    [5] F. F. Evison, The precursory earthquake swarm, Phaysics of the earth and Planatary Interiors,15,19——23,1977

    [6] 华北地区ML地震目录(1952——1974)地震出版社(待发表).

    [7] 北京及邻区地震目录汇编,地震出版社(待发表).

    [8] 张祖胜,唐山7.8级地震的地面形变,欧洲地震委员会地球物理年会报告,1978,斯特拉斯堡.

    [9] 赛克斯,缓慢地震与应力重新分布,国外地震,3, 10——13, 1979

    [10] 许忠淮等,京津唐张地区地震应力场的方向特征,地震学报,1, 2, 121——132, 1979

    [11] 约翰逊,粘滑源参数和地震源参数,国外地震,4, 41——43, 1975

    [12] T .Mikumo, Source process of deep and Intermediate eartliauakes as inferred from long——period P and S waveforms, Physics of the Earth, 19. 4. 303——320. 1971,

    [13] 朱传镇等,海城地震前后微震震源参数和介质品质因子,地球物理学报,20, 3, 228——231, 1977.

    [14] R. Green, A. McGarr, A comparison of the focal mechanism and aftersliock distribution of the Ceres South Africa earthquake of September 29, 1969, BSS9, 62, 3, 869——871, 1972

    [15] 张之立等,唐山地震的破裂过程及其力学分析,地震学报,2,2,111——129.1980

    [16] 邢台地震总结,地震出版社(待发表).

    [17] 顾浩鼎等,1975, 2, 4.辽宁省海城地震的震源机制,地球物理学报,19, 4, 270——284, 1976.

    [18] 吴开统等,海城地震序列的特征,地球物理学报,19, 2, 95——109, 1976.

    [19] D. F'. Hill, A model of earthquake swarm J. G.R.82. 8. 1347——1352. 1977.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 陈颖,田雯,吴庆举,姚志祥. 长宁—昭通页岩气示范区小微地震地方性震级测定. 地球物理学报. 2024(03): 947-959 .
    2. 孙文韬,宣言,江汶乡,王友彪,宋斌. 近断裂带铁路地震预警系统台站布设方案及评价方法. 中国铁道科学. 2023(02): 200-210 .
    3. 支明,徐佳静,孙丽. 地震自动速报综合触发系统产出结果评估. 中国地震. 2023(01): 154-165 .
    4. 支明,梁建宏,孙丽,徐泰然,梁皓,刘敬光. 地震自动速报中常用震级测定方法的适用性研究. 中国地震. 2023(04): 868-882 .
    5. 牟剑英,向巍,李攀攀,徐宁. 广西测震台网台站地方性震级偏差分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2022(02): 18-26 .
    6. 胡宝慧,张浩,教智博,雷凯悦. 地震台站噪声水平和台网监测能力自动化程序的实现. 防灾减灾学报. 2022(03): 42-47 .
    7. 徐一斐,赵韬,邵若潼,张雪娟. 新的震级国家标准在陕西地震台网的应用. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2021(05): 12-20 .
    8. 朱飞鸿,柴旭超,王文青,郭啟倩,张晓曈. 模拟地震图纸数字化存储信息录入的设计与实现. 地震学报. 2020(01): 101-108+121 . 本站查看
    9. 赵建通,马宝君,梁阿全,李俊秋,高双玲. 镜泊湖火山台网监测能力和火山活动性分析. 防灾减灾学报. 2020(04): 57-62 .
    10. 林彬华,金星,陈惠芳,于培青,于伟恒,张燕明,张丽娜,蔡杏辉. 川滇地区烈度计台站测定震级校正分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2020(05): 1-9 .
    11. 刘伟,王庆良,王丽艳,柴旭超,王文青,朱飞鸿. 区域地震台网历史震相数据整合与共享服务. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2020(05): 200-208 .
    12. 张玲. 山西台网新国家标准震级标度与传统震级标度测定地方性震级的对比分析. 山西地震. 2019(02): 8-11 .
    13. 康清清,顾勤平,于悦颖,钱婷,黄群,霍祝青. 江苏及邻区地方性震级量规函数的研究. 中国地震. 2019(03): 521-530 .
    14. 龙锋,蒋长胜,祁玉萍,刘自凤,傅莺. 联合概率法在合并相邻台网地震目录中的应用:以2014年鲁甸序列为例. 地球物理学报. 2018(07): 2815-2827 .
    15. 刘瑞丰,陈运泰,王丽艳. 新的震级国家标准的技术要点与主要特点. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2018(01): 1-11 .
    16. 唐淋,祁国亮,苏金蓉,黄春梅,傅莺,颜利君. 新国家标准震级标度与传统震级标度对比研究. 地震学报. 2018(02): 121-131 . 本站查看
    17. 项月文,陈浩,肖孟仁,曾文敬,肖健. 江西地区地方性震级的量规函数与台基校正值研究. 中国地震. 2018(01): 122-132 .
    18. 晏绮云,董俊,李传江. 江西测震台网新、旧震级国家标准测定地方性震级的对比分析. 国际地震动态. 2018(09): 22-27 .
    19. Liu Ruifeng,Wang Liyan. The Key Technical Points and Main Characteristics of the New National Standard of Magnitude. Earthquake Research in China. 2018(03): 301-314 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1125) PDF downloads (144) Cited by(23)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return