Advanced Search
YAN JIA-QUAN, SHI ZHEN-LIANG, HUAN WEN-LIN, WANG SU-YUNcmult. 1980: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2(4): 395-403.
Citation: YAN JIA-QUAN, SHI ZHEN-LIANG, HUAN WEN-LIN, WANG SU-YUNcmult. 1980: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2(4): 395-403.
shu

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS

  • Institute of Geophysics, State Seismological Bureau

More Information
  • Published Date: August 31, 2011
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In this paper, We studied fault plane solutions of 16 main shocks as well as their foreshocks and strong aftershocks occurred in China and its vicinity. The results show that the fault plane solutions of the foreshocks are rather consistent with that of the main shocks, but some of the aftershocks occurred generally in a day or two after the main shocks are markedly different. The above characteristics might help to estimate the tendency of occurrence of large earthquakes.This difference in fault plane solution may be caused by either local stress field or by various complicated dislocations along fault planes in the focal regions.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (1)
  • [1] 金严等, 辽宁省海城地震前晨震源错动方式的一个特点, 地球物理学报, 19, 3, 1976.

    [2] 陈髓, 用震源机制一致性作为描述地震活动性的新参数, 地球物理学报, 21, 2, 1978.

    [3] 都家全等, 中国及邻区现代构造应力场的区域特征, 地震学报, 1, 1, 1979.

    [4] N. Yamakawa, Stress field in focal region. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 19, 4, 347—353, 1971.

    [5] 三束哲夫, Plate Tectonics から見た地震の分類, 關東地震50周年論文集, 167—184, 1973.

    [6] 长谷川武司, 1970年秋田県南东部の地震の発震機構, 地震, 27, 2, 302—312, 1974.

    [7] 曾融生, 1974年5月11 日云南省永善—大关主震的多重性, 地球物理学报, 21, 2, 1978.

    [8] А. Р. Москвина, Механиэм и парметры очага могодского Эемлетрясения 5 января 1967г. и его афтершовов, Фцэцка Эемлц, 1978, 1.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Gong Liwen, Zhang Huai, Chen Shi, David A. Yuen, Chen Lijuan, Brennan Brunsvik, Yin Guangyao. 2023: Geometry features modeling of three-dimensional fault plane of Changning earthquake based on machine learning. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 45(6): 1040-1054. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220079
    Luo Yi, Hu Yingshun, Tian Yunfeng, Zhang Jingfa. 2021: Seismogenic fault and aftershock characteristics for the 2014 MS7.3 Yutian earthquake，Xinjiang. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 43(1): 48-56. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20200044
    Duan Hurong, Yan Quanchao, Li Run, Chen Shenglei. 2019: Inversion of fault dip angle based on the random sampling consistency combined with the grid search algorithm. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(5): 585-599. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190022
    2010: 震源参数对强地面震动模拟结果的影响
    . Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(1): 51-59.
    2004: 华东地区地电阻率各向异性度的地震前兆异常特征初步研究. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(2): 223-227.
    1991: TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL COMP-OSITE FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL EARTHQUAKES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 13(1): 9-20.
    JIN YAMIN, YU XINCHANG, JIANG CHUNHUAcom sh advance. 1989: FUZZY CLUSTER ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS OF SMALL EARTHQUAKES THAT OCCURRED IN NORTH CHINA. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(2): 198-203.
    ISHIKAWA YUZOup, ZHU CHUANZHENup2, CAD TIANQINGup3. 1983: ON SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS OF THE 1976 TANGSHAN, 1975 HAICHENG AND 1976 YANYUAN-NINGLANG EARTHQUAKES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 5(1): 15-30.
    1982: DURATION OF THE SEQUENCE OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS OF A MAJOR EARTHQUAKE. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 4(4): 394-403.
    Wang Bi-quan, Yang Jin-ying, Wang Chun-zhencom sh adv. 1979: PSEUDO-PERIODICITY OF STRONG AFTERSHOCKS. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1(2): 154-165.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 贾漯昭，孟令媛，闫睿. 深度学习在地震监测预报中的应用进展. 地震研究. 2024(03): 336-349 .
    2. 刘英杰，黄嘉琦，姜玉凤，邵宇琪，杨文韬，于紫凝，郑海永. 融合电磁和地声特征的地震预测集成学习方法. 计算机技术与发展. 2024(08): 166-174 .
    3. 刘涛，戴志军，陈苏，傅磊. 基于深度学习的地震震级分类. 地震学报. 2022(04): 656-664 . 本站查看
    4. 袁爱璟，王伟君，彭菲，闫坤，寇华东. 机器学习在地震预测中的应用进展. 地震. 2021(01): 51-66 .
    5. 赵阳升. 岩体力学发展的一些回顾与若干未解之百年问题. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(07): 1297-1336 .
    6. 张研，邝贺伟. 地震震级预测的相关向量机模型. 世界地震工程. 2020(01): 212-221 .
    7. 刘北京. 地震预报现状及相关问题探讨. 科技经济导刊. 2020(18): 110+54 .
    8. 王婷，延军平，李双双，万佳，张玉凤. 帕米尔高原Mw≥6.6级地震时间韵律特征. 高原地震. 2020(04): 6-16 .
    9. 王新安，雍珊珊，黄继攀，吕亚轩，张兴，梁意文. 基于AETA监测数据的地震预测研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(02): 209-214 .
    10. 冯锐. 趣味地震学(6):意大利:地震漏报遇到法律追责. 国际地震动态. 2019(06): 32-40 .
    11. 王勇，娄泽生，刘严萍，王轩. 基于小波变换的地震前后GNSS ZTD异常变化分析. 全球定位系统. 2019(03): 62-68 .
    12. 王勇，任栋，娄泽生，郝振航. 地震后水汽异常变化初探. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2019(09): 881-883+909 .
    13. 杨建文，赵家本，张鹏映，何应文，王军，茶文剑. 2018年9月8日云南墨江5.9级地震预测回顾与资料论证. 中国地震. 2019(03): 509-520 .
    14. 李天海. 大数据时代对地震监测预报问题的分析. 门窗. 2019(20): 236 .
    15. 张炜. 缅怀梅世蓉先生, 深入开展单学科地震预测研究——水文地球化学地震前兆研究与回顾. 国际地震动态. 2018(04): 7-17 .
    16. 张肇诚. 学习梅世蓉先生献身地震预报事业的精神和学术思想. 国际地震动态. 2018(04): 1-6 .
    17. 刘双庆，薛艳. 唐山老震区M_L≥2.0地震发震时刻与固体潮极值时刻之时差分布特征. 华北地震科学. 2017(01): 24-31 .
    18. 施冬俊. 地震预报现状及相关问题探讨. 科技资讯. 2017(34): 66-67 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1122) PDF downloads (120) Cited by(26)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return