Li Xiang1,2) Yao Huajian1,2) Li Yu3) Liu Qiyuan3). 2015: Effect of off-great-circle propagation on surface wave phase velocity tomography in western Sichuan. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(1): 15-28. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.01.002
Citation: Li Xiang1,2) Yao Huajian1,2) Li Yu3) Liu Qiyuan3). 2015: Effect of off-great-circle propagation on surface wave phase velocity tomography in western Sichuan. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(1): 15-28. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.01.002

Effect of off-great-circle propagation on surface wave phase velocity tomography in western Sichuan

More Information
  • Published Date: February 01, 2015
  • Surface wave tomography is a very important tool to study shear wave velocity structures of crust and upper mantle. For surface wave phase or group velocity tomography we usually assume that surface waves propagate along great-circle paths. However, when the velocity structure has large variations, surface waves will propagate along off-great-circle paths, and therefore there may exist considerable errors in tomographic inversion results based on great-circle propagation of surface waves. We use the ray-tracing-based surface wave tomography method to analyze how off-great-circle propagation of surface waves influences the results of phase velocity tomography in western Sichuan. During the inversion, the fast marching method is used to track the ray paths of surface waves and the subspace inversion scheme is used for the inversion step. We use synthetic data from a theoretical model and short period ambient noise phase velocity dispersion data from the western Sichuan array for the analysis, and we compare the inversion results based on off-great-circle propagation and great-circle propagation of surface waves. Results of the synthetic tests show that the off-great-circle tomographic method recovers the anomaly better when the variation of the velocity structure is large.The inversion of real data from the western Sichuan array reveals that for the 6 s period data, the differences between the phase velocity tomographic results from the off-great-circle propagation and great-circle propagation methods are rather obvious, which are close to 0.2 km/s in the Sichuan basin. For the 10 s period data, differences between the two methods are much smaller, which are all less than 0.1 km/s.The main reason is due to that the 6 s period data are more sensitive to the complex shallow structure of upper crust, so the effect of off-great-circle propagation on the inversion results is more remarkable. Our results indicate that the off-great-circle propagation effect should be considered in the tomography if the observed phase velocities along different paths have large variations, for example, more than 10% of the average velocity, otherwise the inversion results of regions with large velocity anomalies might have considerable bias.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 贾东辉,余怀忠,赵彬彬,张涛,刘海洋. 基于加卸载响应比理论的断层氢气异常机理研究. 地震研究. 2025(02): 210-219 .
    2. 苏淑娟,陈其峰,孙豪,刘军,冯梁乐,徐继龙,杨彦明,雒昆利. 平原M5.5地震土壤气地球化学特征及成因. 地震地质. 2024(02): 433-448 .
    3. 刘海洋,蒋志英,徐衍刚,贾东辉. 不同抽气深度对阿克苏断层氢观测的影响研究. 内陆地震. 2024(04): 387-393 .
    4. 张文亮,李营,刘兆飞,胡乐,路畅,陈志,韩晓昆. 六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系. 地震地质. 2023(03): 753-771 .
    5. 王江,陈志,张帆,张志相,张素欣. 雄安新区主要断裂带土壤气体的Rn与CO_2脱气特征. 地震地质. 2023(03): 735-752 .
    6. 李继业,胡澜缤,李营,马龙辰,王强,张思萌,李冬妮. 松原M_S5.1地震前断层土壤气H_2、Hg地球化学特征与热红外异常响应研究. 地震工程学报. 2023(04): 933-945 .
    7. 刘兆飞,何鸿毅,陈志,李营,路畅,邵俊杰,高梓涵. 北京黄庄—高丽营断裂土壤气体地球化学特征及其对地震活动的指示. 地震学报. 2023(04): 727-746 . 本站查看
    8. 李继业,胡澜缤,康健,李营,王强,孙强,张雁翔. 松辽盆地主要发震构造土壤氢气地球化学特征. 地震. 2023(01): 152-170 .
    9. 王江,陈志,张帆,张志相,刘兆飞,何鸿毅,唐杰,丁志华,张素欣. 基于土壤气体地球化学的雄安新区活动断裂空间展布及活动性探讨. 地震研究. 2022(02): 264-274 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (1487) PDF downloads (86) Cited by(12)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return