p class=MsoNormal style=margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt p class=MsoNormal style=margin: 0cm 0cm 0ptLiu Yuanyuan ong Jiajun Sidaoers a. 2011: Near surface wave velocity structure in Chinese capital  region based on borehole seismic records. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(3): 342-350.
Citation: p class=MsoNormal style=margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt p class=MsoNormal style=margin: 0cm 0cm 0ptLiu Yuanyuan ong Jiajun Sidaoers a. 2011: Near surface wave velocity structure in Chinese capital  region based on borehole seismic records. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(3): 342-350.

Near surface wave velocity structure in Chinese capital  region based on borehole seismic records

More Information
  • Published Date: May 19, 2011
  • Firstly we collected P and S waveform data from 102 earthquakes with Mge;3.0 for the period 2003 to 2008 observed at 58 borehole stations obtained from the Capital Circle Digital Seismic Telemetry Network catalog. After identifying direct wave and surface reflection wave, we found their delay time varied little despite distinct epicentral distances and azimuths. Based on Snell's law, we developed travel time lags to compute average wave velocity in about 300 meters of soil layer above each station. Our results show that near-surface P-and S-wave average velocity in Chinese capital region ranges from 1.6 to 2.0 km/s and 0.34 to 0.48 km/s respectively,vP/vS is about 4.0mdash;5.3. Furthermore, no obvious lateral variation of P-wave velocity structure or vP/vS is observed by comparing results of 11 borehole stations with the same depth of 247 m. The clear seismic phases for both P-and S-wave suggest no significant velocity discontinuity in the soil layer. The results are useful in both the simulation of strong ground motion and the calculation of detailed velocity structure in the crust or upper mantle, as well as some areas of earthquake engineering.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 曾德民,雒元嘉,杜志超,王心宇. 远近场地震动对隔震建筑抗震韧性影响分析. 工程抗震与加固改造. 2024(05): 80-89+107 .
    2. 岳伟勤,师新虎,张来福,苏小波,贾宏宇. 近场地震下简支梁桥搭接长度需求分析. 世界地震工程. 2023(02): 125-137 .
    3. 王利兵,郭骄,郭建芳,于春颂. 基于Welch谱分析的全球M_S≥7.0地震活动应变能周期特征. 华北地震科学. 2023(01): 59-65 .
    4. 林高聪,潘书华,叶振南. 基于Newmark法的设定地震滑坡危险性评估. 桂林理工大学学报. 2021(03): 525-532 .
    5. 温燕林,宋治平,于海英,黄珂. 1950年墨脱8.6级巨震前地震活动特征与当前喜马拉雅构造带东段大震危险性对比分析. 地球物理学进展. 2016(01): 103-109 .
    6. 庙成,丁明涛,王骏,周鹏. 芦山地震灾区次生山地灾害分布特征及其成因分析. 长江流域资源与环境. 2014(11): 1572-1579 .
    7. 周剑青,郭建芳,朱彦珍,佟鑫,平彩鹏,王秀敏,鞠永,周硕. 地震前昌黎台地电阻率变化特征分析. 地震工程学报. 2014(01): 120-126 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Article views (1975) PDF downloads (227) Cited by(21)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return