Lro WAN-QIN, CHEN YUN-TAI . 1979: A STUDY OF THE FOCAL PROCESS OF THE ZHAO TONG EARTHQUAKE (M=7.l), YUNNAN PROVINCE OF MAY 11, 1974 FROM THE DIRECTIVITY FUNCTION OF RAYLEIGH WAVES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1(1): 25-38.
Citation: Lro WAN-QIN, CHEN YUN-TAI . 1979: A STUDY OF THE FOCAL PROCESS OF THE ZHAO TONG EARTHQUAKE (M=7.l), YUNNAN PROVINCE OF MAY 11, 1974 FROM THE DIRECTIVITY FUNCTION OF RAYLEIGH WAVES. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1(1): 25-38.

A STUDY OF THE FOCAL PROCESS OF THE ZHAO TONG EARTHQUAKE (M=7.l), YUNNAN PROVINCE OF MAY 11, 1974 FROM THE DIRECTIVITY FUNCTION OF RAYLEIGH WAVES

More Information
  • Published Date: August 31, 2011
  • Based on the data of the first P-motion recorded at more than 100 seismographic stations located in China and other parts of the world, the fault plane solution of the Zhao-Tong earthquake of May 11, 1974, Yunnan Province was determined. Using the directivity function and its generalized form of surface waves, the nodal plane striking N45°E has been preferred as the fault plane of this earthquake. The direction of propagation of the fracture is northeast with a velocity of 1.3 km/sec and the total length of the fracture 53 km. The estimation of the seismic moment of this earthquake by spectra density analysis gives a value of 6.5×1025 dyne-cm. From the result thus obtained and in the light of the seismicity and tectonic features of the Zhao-Tong region, it is believed that this earthquake was caused by the action of eastwest tectonic stress field, under which the northeast striking Qiaojia-Lianfeng major fault continued to be fractured toward the northeast, so as to link-up with the Huaying-Yibin major fault by breaking through the gap between them.From the above viewpoint for the model of focal process, we suppose that under the action of the same regional tectonic stress field, the conjugating geological figures, namely, the northwest striking Yiliang-Shuicheng fault and the Emei-Yanjin tectonic structural belt might be seismically dangerous.
  • [1] 冯德益, 1974年5月云南省永善—大关7.1级强震前波速比的异常变化, 地球物理学报, 18, 4, 235—239, 1975.

    [2] 蜀水, 震源应力场岩石膨胀性和水的扩散作用——云南省永善7.1级地震及其前兆孕育发展过程, 地球物理学报, 19, 2, 74—94, 1976.

    [3] 朱成男、陈承照, 1974年云南省昭通地震破裂机制, 地球物理学报, 19, 4, 317—329, 1976.

    [4] 刘正荣、雷素华、胡素华, 1974年5月11日云南省永善—大关地震, 地球物理学报, 20, 2, 110—114, 1977.

    [5] 曾融生, 师洁珊, 1974年5月10日云南省永善—大关主震的多重性, 地球物理学报, 21, 2, 160—173, 1978.

    [6] A. Ben—Menahem, Radiation of seiemic surface waves from finite moving sources, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 51, 3, 401—435, 1961.

    [7] A. Udias, Source parameters of earthquakes from speetra of Rayleigh waves, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc, 4, 353—375, 1971.

    [8] E. Tryggvason, Dissipation of rayleigh wave energy, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 6, 1449—1456, 1965.

    [9] A. Ben—Menafem and D. G. Harkerider, Radiation patterns of seismic surface waves from buried dipolar point sources in a flat stratified earth, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 12, 2605—2634, 1964.

    [10] L. Knopoff, Energy release in earthquakes, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 1, 1, 44—52, 1958.

    [11] K. Aki, Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964. part 2, Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress—strain drop from the G wave spectrum, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Tokyo Univ., 44, 1, 73—88, 1966.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 张宇,王兰炜,胡哲,张兴国,娄晓宇. 点源干扰源定位方法及其在地电场观测中的实际应用. 地震学报. 2024(01): 106-119 . 本站查看
    2. 李钟慧,王兰炜,张宇,张兴国,蒋延林,张秀霞. 高压直流输电对地电场观测影响特征分析. 高电压技术. 2024(03): 1244-1251 .
    3. 贾思超 ,赵文舟 ,吴珊珊 ,李伟 ,裴晓 ,方国庆 . 关于青浦金泽台地电场观测所受干扰的研究. 科技与创新. 2023(12): 1-7+10 .
    4. 何学秋,孙晓磊,殷山,宋大钊,邱黎明,童永军,王桥,李杰. 岩石破坏过程磁场效应实验研究及其对地震预报的意义. 地球物理学报. 2023(11): 4609-4624 .
    5. 赵文舟,马钦忠,李伟,周江南. 人工源地电场“选择性”现象研究. 地球物理学报. 2022(05): 1742-1752 .
    6. 赵文舟,李伟,温燕林,陈迁. 高压直流输电入地电流对地电场观测设施的腐蚀分析. 地震地磁观测与研究. 2022(02): 46-53 .
    7. Guoze ZHAO,Xuemin ZHANG,Juntao CAI,Yan ZHAN,Qinzhong MA,Ji TANG,Xuebin DU,Bing HAN,Lifeng WANG,Xiaobin CHEN,Qibin XIAO,Xiangyu SUN,Zeyi DONG,Jijun WANG,Jihong ZHANG,Ye FAN,Tao YE. A review of seismo-electromagnetic research in China. Science China(Earth Sciences). 2022(07): 1229-1246 .
    8. 赵国泽,张学民,蔡军涛,詹艳,马钦忠,汤吉,杜学彬,韩冰,王立凤,陈小斌,肖骑彬,孙翔宇,董泽义,王继军,张继红,范晔,叶涛. 中国地震电磁研究现状和发展趋势. 中国科学:地球科学. 2022(08): 1499-1515 .
    9. 章鑫,范晔,叶青,钱银苹. HVDC入地电流对地电场的影响规律及入地极定位. 地震地质. 2022(03): 718-735 .
    10. 罗词建. 宝德线高压直流输电附加电场变化特征. 华北地震科学. 2021(04): 95-103 .
    11. 张波,谭大诚,罗娜,尹小兵,吴鹤帅. 高压直流输电对大柏舍台地电场观测干扰的分析. 地震. 2020(01): 140-150 .
    12. 罗词建,王秋宁,李媛媛,王军儒,刘伟. 高压直流输电对陕西地电场观测的影响. 华北地震科学. 2019(03): 81-88 .
    13. 马钦忠. 与2008年汶川M_S8.0地震有关的成都台地电场异常信号. 地震学报. 2018(03): 351-363 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (1577) PDF downloads (177) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return