Advanced Search
Yan J R，Zhang Y S，Kan W L. 2022. Review on research of ground motion site adjustment coefficient. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（5）：783−796. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220086
Citation: Yan J R，Zhang Y S，Kan W L. 2022. Review on research of ground motion site adjustment coefficient. Acta Seismologica Sinica，44（5）：783−796. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220086
shu

Review on research of ground motion site adjustment coefficient

  • China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center，Beijing 100029，China

More Information
  • Received Date: June 05, 2022
  • Revised Date: August 09, 2022
  • Available Online: August 31, 2022
  • Published Date: September 14, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • This paper reviews and summarizes the main research results on the adjustment coefficients of ground motion field at home and abroad over the past 20 years, focusing on the effective means of considering the influence of filed conditions on ground motion parameters through strong ground motion observation and numerical theory methods. It summarizes the applicability along with the pros and cons of various methods, conducts a comparative analysis of the main results at home and abroad by combining relevant codes and provisions, and concludes that the coefficients of soft soil field in China are smaller than the international level. What’s more, the reasons for this difference are further analyzed. Finally, based on the current development trend of international seismic zoning work and the new technical requirements of the relevant codes in various industries, it puts forward prospects for the research work of the new generation of zoning maps.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (72)
  • 薄景山. 1998. 场地分类和设计反应谱调整方法研究（博士后研究报告）[R]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 55–58.
    Bo J S. 1998. Site Classification and Design Response Spectrum Adjustment Method （Postdoctoral Research Report）[R]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 55–58 （in Chinese）.
    崔昊,丁海平. 2016. 基于KiK-net强震记录的场地调整系数估计[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,36(4):147–152. doi: 10.13197/j.eeev.2016.04.147.cuih.017
    Cui H,Ding H P. 2016. Estimation of site coefficient based on KiK-net strong-motion seismograph network[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,36(4):147–152 (in Chinese).
    丁海平,王康. 2022. 基于反演基岩地震波的场地调整系数估计[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,42(1):25–33. doi: 10.13197/j.eeed.2022.0103
    Ding H P,Wang K. 2022. Estimation of site coefficient based on inversion of bedrock input[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,42(1):25–33 (in Chinese).
    窦立军. 2001. 场地条件与设计地震动[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 20–21.
    Dou L J. 2001. Site Conditions and Design Ground Motion[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 20–21 （in Chinese）.
    耿淑伟. 2005. 抗震设计规范中地震作用的规定[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 67–68.
    Geng S W. 2005. Regulation of Seismic Action in Earthquake Resistant Design Code[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 67–68 （in Chinese）.
    郭锋,吴东明,许国富,伋雨林. 2011. 场地条件对抗震设计反应谱最大值的影响[J]. 土木工程与管理学报,28(1):69–72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0985.2011.01.015
    Guo F,Wu D M,Xu G F,Ji Y L. 2011. Effect of site condition on the maximum value of seismic design response spectrum[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,28(1):69–72 (in Chinese).
    郭晓云,薄景山,巴文辉. 2012. 汶川地震不同场地反应谱平台值统计分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,32(4):54–62. doi: 10.13197/j.eeev.2012.04.006
    Guo X Y,Bo J S,Ba W H. 2012. Statistical analysis of peak flat values of response spectra in different site conditions based on Wenchuan strong ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,32(4):54–62 (in Chinese).
    蒋通,邢海灵. 2007. 水平土层地震反应分析考虑频率相关性的等效线性化方法[J]. 岩土工程学报,29(2):218–223. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.02.011
    Jiang T,Xing H L. 2007. An equivalent linear method considering frequency-dependent soil properties for seismic response analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,29(2):218–223 (in Chinese).
    李洪达. 2015. 基于NGA-West2数据的场地系数研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学: 59–60.
    Li H D. 2015. Site Coefficients From NGA-West2 Data[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology: 59–60 （in Chinese）.
    李瑞山,袁晓铭. 2019. 场地放大系数的理论解答[J]. 岩土工程学报,41(6):1066–1073.
    Li R S,Yuan X M. 2019. Theoretical solution of site amplification coefficient[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,41(6):1066–1073 (in Chinese).
    李小军,彭青. 2001. 不同类别场地地震动参数的计算分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,21(1):29–36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2001.01.005
    Li X J,Peng Q. 2001. Calculation and analysis of earthquake ground motion parameters for different site categories[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,21(1):29–36 (in Chinese).
    李小军. 2013. 地震动参数区划图场地条件影响调整[J]. 岩土工程学报,35(增刊):21–29.
    Li X J. 2013. Adjustment of seismic ground motion parameters considering site effects in seismic zonation map[J]. Chinese Jour- nal of Geotechnical Engineering,35(S2):21–29 (in Chinese).
    卢滔. 2003. 响嘡台阵场地特征及其反应的分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 75–77.
    Lu T. 2003. Analysis of Site Characteristics and Reaction of the Boomed Array in Xiangtang[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 75–77 （in Chinese）.
    栾极. 2012. 设计反应谱场地放大系数和动力放大系数的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学: 30–31.
    Luan J. 2012. Study on Site Amplification Coefficient and Dynamic Amplification Coefficient of Seismic Design Response Spectrum[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology: 30–31 （in Chinese）.
    吕红山,赵凤新. 2007. 适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J]. 地震学报,29(1):67–76. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2007.01.008
    Lü H S,Zhao F X. 2007. Site coefficients suitable to China site category[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,29(1):67–76 (in Chinese).
    吕悦军,彭艳菊,兰景岩,孟小红. 2008. 场地条件对地震动参数影响的关键问题[J]. 震灾防御技术,3(2):126–135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5722.2008.02.003
    Lü Y J,Peng Y J,Lan J Y,Meng X H. 2008. Some key problems about site effects on seismic ground motion parameters[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,3(2):126–135 (in Chinese).
    齐鑫,肖遥. 2012. 下辽河地区典型土层地震反应时域和频域方法对比[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,32(1):23–29. doi: 10.13197/j.eeev.2012.01.003
    Qi X,Xiao Y. 2012. Comparison of seismic responses of typical soil layers in Liaohe River plain by using time domain method and frequency domain method[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,32(1):23–29 (in Chinese).
    荣棉水,李小军,卢滔,黄雅虹,吕悦军. 2013. 对含厚软表层海域工程场地设计地震动参数确定的一点建议[J]. 地震学报,35(2):262–271. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.02.012
    Rong M S,Li X J,Lu T,Huang Y H,Lü Y J. 2013. Suggestion on determination of design ground motion parameters for offshore engineering sites with deep soft surface layers[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,35(2):262–271 (in Chinese).
    史大成. 2013. 区域性场地地震动放大研究及应用[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 86–87.
    Shi D C. 2013. Study on Ground Motion Amplification of Regional Site and Application[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration: 86–87 （in Chinese）.
    王金元. 2013. 抗震设计规范中竖向地震作用规定的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学: 35–36.
    Wang J Y. 2013. Study on Vertical Earthquake Action Stipulated in Seismic Design Specification[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology: 35–36 （in Chinese）.
    闫静茹,张郁山,郝明辉. 2020. 山东省不同场地PGA放大影响研究[J]. 地震研究,43(3):569–575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2020.03.020
    Yan J R,Zhang Y S,Hao M H. 2020. Study on amplification effect of peak ground acceleration based on different sites in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,43(3):569–575 (in Chinese).
    赵艳,郭明珠,李化明,王文仲. 2009. 对比分析中国有关场地条件对设计反应谱最大值的影响[J]. 地震地质,31(1):186–196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2009.01.017
    Zhao Y,Guo M Z,Li H M,Wang W Z. 2009. Contrast analysis of effect of site condition on the maximum of design response spectra[J]. Seismology and Geology,31(1):186–196 (in Chinese).
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 2016. GB18306—2015 中国地震动参数区划图[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 240.
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration. 2016. Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China: 240 （in Chinese）.
    Aboye S A,Andrus R D,Ravichandran N,Bhuiyan A H,Martin J R,Harman N E. 2014. A new seismic site coefficient model based on conditions in the South Carolina coastal plain[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,104(6):2866–2883. doi: 10.1785/0120140005
    Andreotti G, Lai C G, Francesca B, Scandella L. 2013. New soil factors for the ItalianBuilding Code （NTC08） derived from 1D fully stochastic ground response analyses[C]//Proceedings XV Symp. Roma: Italian National Association of Earthquake Engineering: 1–12.
    Borcherdt R D. 1994. Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design:Methodology and justification[J]. Earthq Spectra,10(4):617–653. doi: 10.1193/1.1585791
    Borcherdt R D. 2002. Empirical evidence for site coefficients in building code provisions[J]. Earthq Spectra,18(2):189–217. doi: 10.1193/1.1486243
    Borcherdt R D, Glassmoyer G, Dietel C, Westerlund R E. 2005. Integrated surface and borehole strong-motion, soil-response arrays in San Francisco, California: Empirical measurements of low-strain site coefficients at site class E and D soil sites[G]//Directions in Strong Motion Instrumentation. Dordrecht: Springer: 55.
    Borcherdt R D. 2014. Implications of next generation attenuation ground motion prediction equations for site coefficients used in earthquake resistant design[J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn,43(9):1343–1360. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2400
    Choi Y,Stewart J P. 2005. Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity[J]. Earthq Spectra,21(1):1–30. doi: 10.1193/1.1856535
    Crouse C B,McGuire J W. 1996. Site response studies for purpose of revising NEHRP seismic provisions[J]. Earthq Spectra,12(3):407–439. doi: 10.1193/1.1585891
    Dobry R, Ramos R, Power M S. 1999. Site Factors and Site Categories in Seismic Codes: Technical Report MCEER-99-0010[R]. New York: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: 1−81.
    European Committee for Standardization. 2003. CEN-EN 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization: 19–30.
    Hwang H H M,Lin H J,Huo J R. 1997. Site coefficients for design of buildings in eastern United States[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,16(1):29–40. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(96)00031-0
    Idriss H M. 1990. Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes[C]//Proceedings Memorial Symposium to Honor Professor H B Seed. Berkeley: BiTech Publisher: 273–289.
    Idriss H M. 1991. Earthquake ground motions at soft sites[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. St. Louis: University of Missouri-Rolla: 2265–2273.
    Joyner W B, Boore D M. 2000. Recent developments in earthquake ground-motion estimation[C]//Proc. of Sixth International Conference on Seismic Zonation. California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute: 3–4.
    Moon S W,Hashash Y M A,Park D. 2017. USGS hazard map compatible depth-dependent seismic site coefficients for the Upper Mississippi Embayment[J]. KSCE J Civil Eng,21(1):220–231. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0681-4
    Paolucci R,Aimar M,Ciancimino A,Dotti M,Foti S,Lanzano G,Mattevi P,Pacor F,Vanini M. 2021. Checking the site categorization criteria and amplification factors of the 2021 draft of Eurocode 8 Part 1-1[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,19(11):4199–4234.
    Pitilakis K,Riga E,Anastasiadis A,Fotopoulou S,Karafagka S. 2019. Towards the revision of EC8:Proposal for an alternative site classification scheme and associated intensity dependent spectral amplification factors[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,126:105137. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.030
    Régnier J,Bonilla L F,Bard P Y,Bertrand E,Hollender F,Kawase H,Sicilia D,Arduino P,Amorosi A,Asimaki D,Boldini D,Chen L,Chiaradonna A,Demartin F,Elgamal A,Falcone G,Foerster E,Foti S,Garini E,Gazetas G,Gélis C,Ghofrani A,Giannakou A,Gingery J,Glinsky N,Harmon J,Hashash Y,Iai S,Kramer S,Kontoe S,Kristek J,Lanzo G,Lernia A D,Lopez‐caballero F,Marot M,Mcallister G,Mercerat E D,Moczo P,Montoya‐Noguera S,Musgrove M,Nieto‐ferro A,Pagliaroli A,Passeri F,Richterova A,Sajana S,D’avila M P S,Shi J,Silvestri F,Taiebat M,Tropeano G,Vandeputte D,Verrucci L. 2018. PRENOLIN:International benchmark on 1D nonlinear site-response analysis:Validation phase exercise[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,108(2):876–900.
    Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray J D, Abrahamson N. 1999. Characterization of Site Response General Categories, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report[R]. Berkeley: Pacific Gas and Electric Company: 75–84.
    Sandikkaya M A,Akkar S,Bard P Y. 2013. A nonlinear site‐amplification model for the next Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,103(1):19–32. doi: 10.1785/0120120008
    Seyhan E,Stewart J P. 2014. Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations[J]. Earthq Spectra,30(3):1241–1256. doi: 10.1193/063013EQS181M
    Silva W, Darragh R, Gregor N, Martin G, Abrahamson N, Kircher C. 2000. Reassessment of Site Coefficients and Near-fault Factors for Building Code Provisions[R]. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey （USGS）.
    Society of Civil Engineerings. 2000. Earthquake Resistance Design Codes in Japan[S]. Tokyo: The Publication Committee of Earthquake Resistant Design Codes of Civil Engineering Structures in Japan: 57.
    Stewart J P,Liu A H,Choi Y. 2003. Amplification factors for spectral acceleration in tectonically active regions[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am,93(1):332–352. doi: 10.1785/0120020049
    Sun J, Idriss I M. 1992. User’s Manual for SHAKE91: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits[M]. California: University of California: 1–2.
    Tropeano G,Soccodato F M,Silvestri F. 2018. Re-evaluation of code-specified stratigraphic amplification factors based on Italian experimental records and numerical seismic response analyses[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng,110:262–275. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.030
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    Meng Sibo, Wei Shitao, Liu Zhongxian, Li Wenxuan, Liu Ying. 2024: Ground motion variability of a mountain-canyon site near a strike-slip fault considering uncertainty of source. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 46(6): 1034-1050. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20230029
    Lang Ziping, Yu Ruifang, Xiao Liang, Fu Lei, Zhou Jian. 2023: An estimation model of high frequency attenuation coefficient of ground motion for local site. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 45(5): 919-928. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20220053
    Ren Meng, Jiang Daodong, Huang Wei, Li Xuesong. 2020: Numerical and theoretical analyses of seismic wave response in non-persistent jointed rock mass. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 42(1): 44-52. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20190090
    Wu Yongqi, Zhang Haiming. 2018: Determining the threshold value in upper limit of wavenumber integration by reflection-transmission coefficient in theoretical seismograms calculation. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 40(6): 719-727. DOI: 10.11939/jass.20180013
    Wang Wei, Liu Bi deng, Liu Pei xuan, Wang Zhenyu, Liu Xin. 2016: Analyses on the effect of the local site conditions on the strong motion based on the array records. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(2): 307-317. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2016.02.014
    Wang Wei, Liu Bideng, Liu Xin, Yang Mingliang, Zhou Zhenghua. 2015: Analysis on the hill topography effect based on the strong ground motion records of Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(3): 452-462. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.03.008
    Zhang Lingkong　Niu Anfu. 2015: Calculation of borehole coupling coefficient based on borehole volume strain and area strain observation. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 37(1): 80-88. DOI: 10.11939/jass.2015.01.007
    Rong Mianshui, Wang Shiyuan, Li Xiaojun, Lü Yuejun, Sheng Qiang, Huang Yahong, Fang Yi. 2013: Calculation and analysis of seismic ground motion parameters for different engineering geological divisions of Chengdu basin. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(4): 543-552. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.045.009
    2010: 震源参数对强地面震动模拟结果的影响
    . Acta Seismologica Sinica, 32(1): 51-59.
    1990: CALCULATION OF THE THEORETICAL EARTH TIDES OF A ROTATING ELLIPTICAL ELASTIC EARTH MODEL. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 12(3): 282-291.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (462) PDF downloads (163) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return