Meng Lingyuan, Shi Baoping, Liu Jie. 2013: Characteristics of strong ground motion from the sequence of New Zealand earthquake: 2010, MW7.0, main shock and 2011, MW6.1, aftershock. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(3): 351-368. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.03.007
Citation: Meng Lingyuan, Shi Baoping, Liu Jie. 2013: Characteristics of strong ground motion from the sequence of New Zealand earthquake: 2010, MW7.0, main shock and 2011, MW6.1, aftershock. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 35(3): 351-368. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2013.03.007

Characteristics of strong ground motion from the sequence of New Zealand earthquake: 2010, MW7.0, main shock and 2011, MW6.1, aftershock

More Information
  • Received Date: April 17, 2012
  • Revised Date: July 23, 2012
  • Published Date: April 30, 2013
  • The New Zealand earthquake of September 3, 2010, MW7.0 occurred in the South Island of New Zealand with depth of 10 km. The February 21, 2011, South Island, New Zealand, earthquake occurred as a part of the aftershock sequence of the 2010 MW7.0 mainshock (Darfield earthquake of 2010). This largest MW 6.1 aftershock (Christchurch earthquake of 2011) is significantly closer to the main population center of Christchurch, New Zealand, than is the September 2010 mainshock, however, violent MW6.1 aftershock was caused by movement along a fault that does not appear to have broken the surface. Considering the amplification of shallow velocity structure (vS30), we compared the observed horizontal PGAs (peak ground acceleration) and PGVs (peak ground velocity) of both the mainshock and aftershock with NGA (next generation attenuation), respectively. The near-field strong ground motion of the aftershock is higher than the observations of mainshock. For the New Zealand sequence, two special finite fault models, dynamical composite source model (DCSM) and scholastic finite-fault model (SFFM), are constructed for Darfield and Christchurch earthquake of 2010 and 2011, respectively. For comparison purpose, we also conducted the broadband ground motion predictions for the station of Heathcote Valley Primary School (HVSC) and Greendale station (GDLC), which are the nearest stations from the epicenter of mainshock and aftershock, respectively. We compared the advantage and limitation of the DCSM and SFFM, respectively, for developing appropriate technique to generate the shaking map in real time and for earthquake early warning.
  • 姜慧. 2005. 地震动随机模拟方法中的场地效应研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所: 19.
    孟令媛, 史保平. 2012. 2011年新西兰MW6.1地震震源过程及强地面运动特征初步分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 55(4): 1601-1612.
    孟令媛, 史保平. 2011. 应用动态复合震源模型模拟汶川MW7.9地震强地面运动[J]. 地球物理学报, 54(4): 1010-1027.
    史保平, 孟令媛. 2010. 基于物理过程的强地表运动预测[G]//10000个科学难题: 地球科学卷. 北京: 科学出版社: 563-567.
    王海云. 2004. 近场强地震动预测的有限断层震源模型[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所: 99.
    Allen T I, Trevor D, Cummins P R, Schneider J F. 2006. Empirical attenuation of ground-motion spectral amplitudes in southwestern Western Australia [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 96(2): 572-585.
    Aoi Shin, Takashi Kunugi, Hiroyuki Fujiwara. 2008. Trampoline effect in extreme ground motion[J]. Science, 322(5902): 727-730.
    Atkinson G M. 1984. Attenuation of strong ground motion in Canada from a random vibrations approach[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 74(1): 2629-2653.
    Atkinson G M, Boore D M. 1995. Ground-motion relations for eastern North America[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 85(1): 17-30.
    Atkinson G M, Boore D M. 1998. Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 88(4): 917-934.
    Beresnev I A, Atkinson G M. 1998. FINSIM-a FORTRAN program for simulation stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults[J]. Seism Res Lett, 69(1): 27-32.
    Boatwright J. 1982. The dynamic models for far-field acceleration[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 72(8): 1049-1068.
    Boore D M. 1983. Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological model of the radiated spectra [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 73(2): 1865-1894.
    Boore D M, Atkinson G M. 2007. Boore-Atkinson NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters[R]. Berkeley, california: Pacific earthquake engineering research center: 9-58.
    Boore D M, Joyner W B, Fumal T E. 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work[J]. Seism Res Lett, 68(1): 128-153.
    Brune J N. 1970. Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 75(26): 4997-5009.
    Brune J N. 1971. Correction to tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes[J]. J Geophys Res, 76(20): 5002.
    Chandler A M, Lam N T, Tsang H H. 2006. Near-surface attenuation modelling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile[J]. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 26(11): 1004-1014.
    Frankel A. 1991. High-frequency spectral fall off for earthquakes, fractal dimension of strength on faults[J]. J Geophys Res, 96(B4): 6291-6302.
    Fry B, Benites R, Kaiser A. 2011. The character of accelerations in the MW6.2 Christchurch earthquake[J]. Seism Res Lett, 82(6): 846-852.
    Hanks T C, McGuire R K. 1981. The character of high-frequency strong ground motion[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 71(6): 2071-2095.
    Hartzell S H, Heaton T H. 1983. Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 73(6A): 1553-1583.
    Irikura K. 1986. Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green's function[C]//Proceeding of the 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium. Tokyo: Center for Academic Publications Japan: 151-156.
    Motazedian D, Atkinson G M. 2005. Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 95(3): 995-1010.
    Zeng Y, Anderson J G, Yu G. 1994. A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 21(8): 725-728.
  • Related Articles

Catalog

    Article views (576) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return